Re: [PATCH] ares_free_reply (Was: Re: [PATCH] ares_parse_txt_reply)

2009-11-09 Thread Yang Tse
Jakub, I haven't forgotten you. Its simply I'm very short of time. You're the next on my list. Cheers, -- -=[Yang]=-

Re: [PATCH] ares_free_reply (Was: Re: [PATCH] ares_parse_txt_reply)

2009-11-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/02/2009 07:59 PM, Yang Tse wrote: > Hmm, I've started writing a theoretical comparison of both approaches, > but I've deleted it all. Tomorrow most probably.I'm going to code my > version, and afterwards I'll comment. Hi, is there anything I ca

Re: CNAME following genericly

2009-11-09 Thread Daniel Black
On Monday 09 November 2009 18:04:50 Erik Kline wrote: > Under what circumstances would you not want to follow CNAMEs (apart > when that's forbidden or recommended against by some spec for a given > RR type)? going in loops, potentially excessive chain lengths however time-outs handle that. But