Hi all
I would also be interested in hearing about anyone using SAN technologies
especially iSCSI to provide storage to a sendmail/IMAP server?
I like to idea of being able to move the storage off the server to improve
reliability.
We could move the service (and data) between servers with just a
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Guy Dawson wrote:
iSCSI servers can be configured to support multiple seperate iSCSI
targets (logical disks) for multiple seperate iSCSI clients (servers).
Each server having it's own logical disk. In this instance there is no
shared file system. However all file systems are st
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote:
Does anybody have any experiense on such a configuration? iSCSI
partitions look like local disks to the OS (or at least this is my
understandig) but in truth they reside on another server on the network.
I doubt very much that
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote:
Does anybody have any experiense on such a configuration? iSCSI partitions
look like local disks to the OS (or at least this is my understandig) but in
truth they reside on another server on the network.
I doubt very much that mbx format will work
On Nov 23, 2004, at 12:36, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote:
Does anyone use tmail as the local delivery agent for Postfix? I want
to have MBX mailboxes and Postfix as my MTA.
I use the following config.
main.cf:
mailbox_transport = tmail
# Don't run tmail with multiple recipients
tmail_destination_reci
Does anybody have any experiense on such a configuration? iSCSI
partitions look like local disks to the OS (or at least this is my
understandig) but in truth they reside on another server on the network.
I am going to have 20K mailboxes, but by 2005/06 I may be forced to
increase this number t
Does anyone use tmail as the local delivery agent for Postfix? I want
to have MBX mailboxes and Postfix as my MTA.
TIA.
--
--
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-l
