Re: Problem with MBX INBOX

2005-04-08 Thread Clive McDowell
Mark Crispin wrote: On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Clive McDowell wrote: I have a strange problem with an MBX format INBOX. It contains 6618 messages but only the most recent 33 are being displayed by PINE or any other clients I've tried. That means that the other 6585 messages were deleted and exp

RE: Problem with MBX INBOX

2005-04-08 Thread Clive McDowell
; and the correct number of messages? John, no it reports 'No new messages, 0 total in INBOX' even though the file size is 203661024. Clive McDowell Information Services The Queen's University of Belfast

Problem with MBX INBOX

2005-04-08 Thread Clive McDowell
e a manual repair. There doesn't appear to be a problem with the message immediately prior to the first one being displayed. Any advice on how to proceed will be gratefully received. Thanks, Clive McDowell Information Services The Queen's U

Converting from unix to mbx format

2004-04-02 Thread Clive McDowell
deliver to such inboxes if they exist. Is the best approach to use mailutil for each user? e.g. mailutil move /var/mail/joesoap #driver.mbx/home/joesoap/INBOX Are there any other options? Thanks, Clive McDowell Information Services The Queen's University of Be

RE: imap mailbox creation by script

2004-01-21 Thread Clive McDowell
xists and newfile doesn't. Any idea why this doesn't work? Thanks, Clive McDowell Information Services The Queen's University of Belfast

Re: sharing mailboxes

2003-08-20 Thread Clive McDowell
ser with appropriate group permissions did not work. The second user had insufficient permissions to remove the lock file and access the inbox. Obviously there was no problem with the owner accessing the mailbox. Configuring Exim not to use lockf cured the problem. Clive McDowell Information

Re: sharing mailboxes

2003-08-19 Thread Clive McDowell
- Original Message - From: "Mark Crispin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Clive McDowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "c-client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:26 AM Subject: Re: sharing mailboxes > Sorry for the delay in re

sharing mailboxes

2003-07-23 Thread Clive McDowell
ercise with Netscape and the same thing happens. The only difference between the test and service machines is the level of activity. Both have the latest version of imapd installed. Any ideas as to why these locking problems should occur on a busy machine? Thanks, Clive McDowell Information