Re: slow performace

2002-11-06 Thread Mark Crispin
Well, we run many more than 250 imapd processes on our IMAP servers. If you are running a SVR4 type system, are you observing any zombie processes?

Re: slow performace

2002-11-06 Thread Robert Hooper
we don't have many pop users but we do have VERY large folders, and I've notced many of them where not converted to mbx format ;( One user'shad a file that just toped 2 Gigs and was in Unix format !! I'm tring to put together a csplit regular expression to break it up before converting to mbx a

Re: slow performace

2002-11-05 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On Tuesday, November 05, 2002 09:13:24 -0500 Robert Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Right now I'm thinking the problem is either the T3 RAID array with veritas filesystem, or the Gigabit interface, but the old system was using slower SCSI2 disks and 100baseT so it should be faster. I would be

Re: slow performace

2002-11-05 Thread Robert Hooper
sorry for being triss in my previous message but I was in panic mode;) Access to large folders is where we first see problems, an open can take a long time as can an append, as when saving a copy to Sent. Some users see timeout errors. This problem seems to get worse over time. from a systems pers

re: slow performace

2002-11-04 Thread Mark Crispin
Unfortunately, your message doesn't give enough information to go on. How is the server slow? Slow to connect? Slow to authenticate? Slow to open the mailbox? How much observed disk activity is there? Is the disk thrashing? What is the load average? How much swapping? All these are things