Hi Matt,
It didn't work for me as you suggested. Please reply to my mail on this in
archive.!
warm regards
Saurabh
"Biao Hou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/07/2005 10:46 PM
Please respond to
c-dev@xerces.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit system?
Hi Mat
Hi
I did try buildign it. 64 bit is not supported on Xerces for GCC but for
native compiler you should be able to use the runConfigure and build.
warm regards
Saurabh
"Biao Hou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/07/2005 08:56 PM
Please respond to
c-dev@xerces.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
Can Xerces b
Dave,
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:56 PM, James Berry wrote:
Dave,
/home/dbertoni/apache/xml-xerces.svn/c-3.0/src/../config/pretty-
make: bad
substitution.
Does this error go away if you configure --disable-pretty-make ?
This was an error in the pretty-make script (it worked w/ bash as /
bi
Hi Axel,
Thanks a lot. When I added following release statements (both are
required) it worked fine.
XMLString::release(&xXml);
XMLString::release(&pChar);
Delete of the variables did not work and hence I though the leak is
within the writeToString method.
Thanks again
Biju
On Jun 7, 2005, at 6:55 PM, Greg Franks wrote:
config/pretty-make isn't compatible with generic bourne shell. I had
to substitute #!/bin/sh with #!/bin/bash.
/home/greg/src/xerces-3.0/src/../config/pretty-make: bad substitution
make[2]: *** [xercesc/util/Base64.lo] Error 1
Can you try again
On Jun 7, 2005, at 7:00 PM, Greg Franks wrote:
Compiling xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp
"xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp", line 555: Error: "static
xercesc_3_0::XMLPlatformUtils::closeFile(void*const,
xercesc_3_0::MemoryManager*const)" cannot return a value.
"xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp",
Compiling xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp
"xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp", line 555: Error: "static
xercesc_3_0::XMLPlatformUtils::closeFile(void*const,
xercesc_3_0::MemoryManager*const)" cannot return a value.
"xercesc/util/PlatformUtils.cpp", line 565: Error: "static
xercesc_3_0::XMLPlatformUt
> "James" == James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> Hi Greg, That would be great. The branch is on svn at
James> http://svn.apache.org/
James> repos/asf/xerces/c/branches/jberry/3.0-unstable.
Configure.in probably needs the following for solaris.
AC_CHECK_LIB([socket],
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1433?page=all ]
Alberto Massari closed XERCESC-1433:
Resolution: Invalid
> Memory leak with WriteToString
> --
>
> Key: XERCESC-1433
> URL: http://issue
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1433?page=comments#action_12312974
]
Biju George commented on XERCESC-1433:
--
Thanks a lot. When I added following release statements (both are required) it
worked fine.
XMLString::release(&xXml)
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:56 PM, James Berry wrote:
AIX using gcc results in the following:
...
Doing "make clean distclean" results in the following error:
depcomp: Variables source, object and depmode must be set
make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
Can you give me any
Dave,
Thanks for your reports. I'll go through them below...
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIX using gcc results in the following:
...
xercesc/util/Transcoders/Iconv/IconvTransService.cpp:296: `maxBytes'
undeclared (first use this function)
xercesc/util/Transcoders/Ic
> Per previous discussion, I've been holding off of merging the 3.0-
> unstable branch into trunk until we feel like we have the needed
> minimum platform support. This is my weekly email to check in on the
> status of that proposition ;)
>
> My understanding of the build status of the new stuf
Hi Greg,
That would be great. The branch is on svn at http://svn.apache.org/
repos/asf/xerces/c/branches/jberry/3.0-unstable.
I believe there's an error in the Iconv translator at the moment that
will prevent you from building completely, but we should get that
patched up soon (I've asked
Hi,
if I remember correctly, I had problems compiling the winsock code, so
there is no support for network access at the moment. In the current
3.0-unstable branch it compiles (even if I didn't test it), so you can try
integrating this version (from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xerces/c/br
Good question. If we can cobble together some test code, I will try it.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:09 PM
To: c-dev@xerces.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can Xerces be built on Solaris x86 64bit system?
Out of curiosity, can yo
Out of curiosity, can you use the WFScanner with the GCC-built version
of Xerces? I have run into a defect with the 64-bit version built with
Forte, where an exception thrown from the WFScanner will cause a sig
abort, as the runtime peeks up the stack, looking for a frame to catch
the except
If you are looking for a sloaris build, point me to the right SVN
location and I'll give it a whirl. Solaris 9, SunPro CC 5.
gcc 3.3 also.
James Berry wrote:
Per previous discussion, I've been holding off of merging the 3.0-
unstable branch into trunk until we feel like we have the needed
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1430?page=comments#action_12312920
]
Alberto Massari commented on XERCESC-1430:
--
Hi Daniel,
the VC7 project is not currently updated, mainly because all the VC7 users
could upgrade to VC7.1 for a nomi
It is, yes, but the two should be similar.
The only big difference should be the compiler optimization flags and the
platform argument for the configure script.
I was thinking you could experiment with it and try to get it to work...
--Matt
-Original Message-
From: Biao Hou [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Matt,
It looks like your 64bit is on SPARC 64bit instead of x86 64bit. Right?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:09 PM
To: c-dev@xerces.apache.org; xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: Can Xerces be built on S
Interesting question.
I got 64-bit working on Solaris with GCC.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=111632243828922&w=2#1
See if it works for you.
HTH,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Biao Hou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:27 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apa
Interesting question.
I got 64-bit working on Solaris with GCC.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=111632243828922&w=2#1
See if it works for you.
HTH,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Biao Hou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:27 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apa
Per previous discussion, I've been holding off of merging the 3.0-
unstable branch into trunk until we feel like we have the needed
minimum platform support. This is my weekly email to check in on the
status of that proposition ;)
My understanding of the build status of the new stuff on the
At 11.42 06/06/2005 -0400, Quigley, Amy @GSI wrote:
What is the status of a Selectable Component Build (Xerces-C++ Lite)? My
company needs to reduce the size of our installation kit, by paring down
Xerces to what we really need. Does anyone have any suggestions?
We are currently working on
Hi
All,
Did anyone try to
build Xerces2.6 on Solaris x86 64bit system yet?
Thanks
If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender as soon as possible. The contents of this e-mail may b
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1433?page=comments#action_12312869
]
Jesse Pelton commented on XERCESC-1433:
---
DOMWriter::writeToString() allocates the string that it returns to the caller.
If there's a bug here, it's in the documentati
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1433?page=comments#action_12312866
]
Axel Weiss commented on XERCESC-1433:
-
Hi Biju,
I guess you forgot to release the transcoded string (which is your variable
pChar). So your routine itself leaks. Then,
Memory leak with WriteToString
--
Key: XERCESC-1433
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1433
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Bug
Components: DOM
Versions: 2.6.0
Environment: HP-UX 11i and compiler HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.
Hey,
Take a look at the bottom of any of these emails to find out how to
unsubscribe.
Gareth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please remove me from the mailing list.
Mor
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:18 AM
To: xerc
Hi,
Please remove me from the mailing list.
Mor
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:18 AM
To: xerces-c-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: mailing lists
Hey all,
A reminder to use c-dev@xerces.apache.org and
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hey all,
A reminder to use c-dev@xerces.apache.org and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not the old xerces-c-dev. I am aware there are a couple of links left to
the old lists on the site - I will change them ASAP.
Cheers,
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-81118
32 matches
Mail list logo
