[jira] Resolved: (XERCESC-1830) DOMPrint sample build with Borland compiler: Ambiguity between 'DOMDocument' and 'xercesc_3_0::DOMDocument

2008-09-18 Thread Alberto Massari (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1830. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0.0 Assignee: Alberto Massari Than

[jira] Created: (XERCESC-1830) DOMPrint sample build with Borland compiler: Ambiguity between 'DOMDocument' and 'xercesc_3_0::DOMDocument

2008-09-18 Thread Vitaly Prapirny (JIRA)
DOMPrint sample build with Borland compiler: Ambiguity between 'DOMDocument' and 'xercesc_3_0::DOMDocument -- Key: XERCESC-1830 URL: https://issues.apache.org/

[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1821) Configurable kInitialHeapAllocSize in xerces

2008-09-18 Thread george (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632488#action_12632488 ] george commented on XERCESC-1821: - One additional comment, I still fell it would be nice

[jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1821) Configurable kInitialHeapAllocSize in xerces

2008-09-18 Thread george (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632487#action_12632487 ] george commented on XERCESC-1821: - Thanks Boris, I downloaded the source, and compiled i

Re: VOTE for the 3.0.0 release

2008-09-18 Thread Michael Glavassevich
+1 from me. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boris Kolpackov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/18/2008 09:51:10 AM: > > Hi Folks, > > The second beta for the 3.0.0 release didn't uncover any major problems. > There were

Re: VOTE for the 3.0.0 release

2008-09-18 Thread John Snelson
+1. Lets get it out the door before we have to change it again for XML 5th edition ;-). Gareth Reakes wrote: +1. Be great to get 3.0 out the door. Thanks Boris. Gareth On 18 Sep 2008, at 15:08, Alberto Massari wrote: +1 for me; thanks Boris for your work! Alberto Boris Kolpackov wrote:

Re: VOTE for the 3.0.0 release

2008-09-18 Thread Gareth Reakes
+1. Be great to get 3.0 out the door. Thanks Boris. Gareth On 18 Sep 2008, at 15:08, Alberto Massari wrote: +1 for me; thanks Boris for your work! Alberto Boris Kolpackov wrote: Hi Folks, The second beta for the 3.0.0 release didn't uncover any major problems. There were a few issues di

Re: VOTE for the 3.0.0 release

2008-09-18 Thread Alberto Massari
+1 for me; thanks Boris for your work! Alberto Boris Kolpackov wrote: Hi Folks, The second beta for the 3.0.0 release didn't uncover any major problems. There were a few issues discovered but those were fairly local and are fixed now. While I am still finalizing the documentation, I would like

VOTE for the 3.0.0 release

2008-09-18 Thread Boris Kolpackov
Hi Folks, The second beta for the 3.0.0 release didn't uncover any major problems. There were a few issues discovered but those were fairly local and are fixed now. While I am still finalizing the documentation, I would like to proceed with the vote for the final 3.0.0 release. Here is my +1. B