Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-19 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 9/19/18, 8:50 AM, "Ivo Schenk" wrote: > ... well, nevermind, saw the WONTFIX at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-2009 More to the point, I don't support or care about cross compiles either, and wouldn't hold a release for them. In any case, having gotten > 3 +1 votes and no

AW: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-19 Thread Ivo Schenk
www.delphin.de Intelligente Messtechnik -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ivo Schenk [mailto:ivo.sch...@delphin.de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2018 14:43 An: c-dev@xerces.apache.org Betreff: AW: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release Maybe I'm a bit late to the party, but configure fails

AW: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-19 Thread Ivo Schenk
_IFELSE by AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was a workaround for me. -- Ivo Schenk -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Cantor, Scott [mailto:canto...@osu.edu] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2018 20:06 An: c-dev@xerces.apache.org Betreff: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release I would like to call for

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-18 Thread Michael Glavassevich
g" > Date: 09/12/2018 02:08 PM > Subject: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release > > I would like to call for a vote to release the RC3 artifact built > from svn revision 1840539 as V3.2.2. It's published and signed at [1]. > > The release notes are at [2]

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-18 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 9/18/18, 3:16 AM, "Thomas Krebs" wrote: > I'm surprised so few Xerces-C users are out there :-( Once a project reaches this state, it's self-fulfilling because it's obviously not sensible to jump onto a dying library with new applications. If I could feasibly jump I would, but I have too mu

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-18 Thread Thomas Krebs
I would also vote +1. I'm surprised so few Xerces-C users are out there :-( Am 9/18/2018 um 7:36 AM schrieb Gareth Reakes: If you guys are happy then I am. +1 G Sent from my iPhone On 17 Sep 2018, at 23:06, Cantor, Scott wrote: On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: Given that it's

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-17 Thread Gareth Reakes
If you guys are happy then I am. +1 G Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Sep 2018, at 23:06, Cantor, Scott wrote: > >> On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: >> >> Given that it's possible to build on Cygwin and MinGW with CMake, I'm >> loath to spend further time on the Autotools build for

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-17 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 9/17/18, 5:56 PM, "Roger Leigh" wrote: > Given that it's possible to build on Cygwin and MinGW with CMake, I'm > loath to spend further time on the Autotools build for these platforms > given that they are a bit niche and there's little additional benefit to > be gained. If anyone really c

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-17 Thread Roger Leigh
On 17/09/18 21:57, Gareth Reakes wrote: I am ready to vote but wanted to see a resolution to the build issue. I thought Scott addressed this in his earlier reply: "That's autotools and since I maintain those scripts and don't support cygwin, you shouldn't expect them to work there. You'd be

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-17 Thread Gareth Reakes
I am ready to vote but wanted to see a resolution to the build issue. G Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Sep 2018, at 21:39, Cantor, Scott wrote: > > I haven't gotten any votes, but given that and the fact that there was at > least one complaint, I'll declare a "mistrial" and await further inst

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-17 Thread Cantor, Scott
I haven't gotten any votes, but given that and the fact that there was at least one complaint, I'll declare a "mistrial" and await further instructions. I have no dog in the hunt due to there being no fixes of relevance to my work so just give a shout and I'll restart another vote and/or upload

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-13 Thread Denis Excoffier
This build (with make as indicated, plus -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX) is ok. However, after 'make install', there is a dangling libxerces-c.so symlink towards cygxerces-c-3-2.dll not installed (but present in build directory). Trying to use this installation fails with many many missing references (t

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Roger Leigh
On 12/09/18 22:45, Denis Excoffier wrote: On 2018-09-21 at 23:31, Roger Leigh wrote: Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. No cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are p

RE: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Cantor, Scott
> > Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? > I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. > No > cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are present). That's autotools and since I maintain those scripts and don't support c

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Denis Excoffier
> On 2018-09-21 at 23:31, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? I don't know. I run ./configure --disable-network --enable-transcoder-iconv. No cmake around (although the cmake and libcurl-devel packages are present). Regards, Denis Excoffier. --

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Denis Excoffier
Forgot to mention that i also tried to build on Linux 32bits (Debian 7), solaris 2.10 and darwin 17.7.0, and succeeded with no problem. > On 2018-09-12 at 23:21, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > Hello, > > Don't know whether it's wise or appropriate to vote +1 and also report an > error (minor): on

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Roger Leigh
Are you building with the autotools build or the cmake build? There are two cygwin variants tested with cmake here for : https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/xerces-c/build/1.0.66 for the latest commit (https://github.com/apache/xerces-c/commits/trunk), which are building w

Re: Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Denis Excoffier
Hello, Don't know whether it's wise or appropriate to vote +1 and also report an error (minor): on a clean and up-to-date cygwin (windows 10, x86_64, pre-2.11.2), i had to remove the two lines: template class ArrayJanitor; template class ArrayJanitor; in src/xercesc/util/JanitorExports.cpp to b

Call for vote on Xerces-C 3.2.2 release

2018-09-12 Thread Cantor, Scott
I would like to call for a vote to release the RC3 artifact built from svn revision 1840539 as V3.2.2. It's published and signed at [1]. The release notes are at [2]. The issues are build related for the most part, nothing substantive. I'll hold the vote open through the weekend, as next week i