Simon Marlow wrote:
This is really the missing piece needed to let GHC use Cabal for its
build system, so I'm pretty keen for this to go in. Comments?
Very nice. This ought to be usable to build RPMs in parallel, too,
which is something that rpmbuild likes to try to do by default.
Cabal has the following branches:
HEAD, in darcs.haskell.org:/cabal, used by GHC HEAD
1.1.6, in darcs.haskell.org/cabal-branches/cabal-1.1.6
GHC 6.6 branch, in darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.6/packages/Cabal
The official 1.1.6 is diverging from GHC's 6.6 version. We should merge the two
- Duncan w
I'm sending this patch here to solicit comments.
Ian Lynagh has been converting GHC's build system to use Cabal for packages
instead of our current Makefile setup. There are a couple of things that don't
work as well with Cabal: (1) we can't use 'make -j' and get parallel builds, and
(2) we c
I think this patch should go in ... any other comments before I
push it?
CHeers,
Simon
This patch is now out of synch. I've attached a new patch that fixes
this (with some additional changes).
/David
new-haddock-cabal.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Fri Sep 15 21:29:49 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add preliminary support for haddock-ghc
Fri Dec 29 20:54:39 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Make sure haddock-ghc really creates the output dir
Sun Dec 31 00:21:16 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add compilerPath to Paths_
Fri Jan 5 22:22:24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fri Sep 15 21:29:49 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add preliminary support for haddock-ghc
Fri Dec 29 20:54:39 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Make sure haddock-ghc really creates the output dir
Sun Dec 31 00:21:16 CET 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add compilerPath to P