On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:51:06PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >
> >It also means that none of your internal modules can depend on any of
> >your normal modules.
>
> Sure they can - the foo-internal package would contain all the modules
> (internal + external), but the foo package would only re-
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:16:10AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
modules: ...
modules[testing]: ...
modules[internal]: ...
A simpler way to solve this problem is to have two packages, with the first
package (foo-internal) exporting all the modules, and the second (foo)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:16:10AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >
> >modules: ...
> >modules[testing]: ...
> >modules[internal]: ...
>
> A simpler way to solve this problem is to have two packages, with the first
> package (foo-internal) exporting all the modules, and the second (foo)
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:06:07PM +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
On 15 jun 2007, at 14.09, Neil Mitchell wrote:
this being common practice, and yet permit it occasionally.
One thing I would like is given a package _data, which provides a data
type, and a package _class whic
