[Hackage] #154: Cabal doesn't clean "_stub" files

2007-09-14 Thread Hackage
#154: Cabal doesn't clean "_stub" files -+-- Reporter: judahj |Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone: Cabal-1.2 Component: Cabal | Version:

Re: cpphs and C++-style comments

2007-09-14 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks. Now we have a conundrum: should Cabal 1.2 use the new option, > > > and thus require the latest cpphs, or stick with the old option and be > > > broken with the new cpphs? Hmm. There could be a better solution. Since no released version o

Re: cpphs and C++-style comments

2007-09-14 Thread Ross Paterson
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:38:41PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED], > cabal-devel@haskell.org writes: > > Thanks. Now we have a conundrum: should Cabal 1.2 use the new option, > > and thus require the latest cpphs, or stick with the old option and be

Re: cpphs and C++-style comments

2007-09-14 Thread Duncan Coutts
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED], cabal-devel@haskell.org writes: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > > > Would you like to have separate option flags in cpphs for stripping > > > > the different kinds of C comment? e.g. --strip and --stripAnsi? >

Re: cpphs and C++-style comments

2007-09-14 Thread Ross Paterson
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > > > Would you like to have separate option flags in cpphs for stripping > > > the different kinds of C comment? e.g. --strip and --stripAnsi? > > > > Separate options would resuscitate the Hugs build, so yes please. > > How about

patch applied (cabal-branches/cabal-1.2): Add a boring file

2007-09-14 Thread Ian Lynagh
Thu Sep 13 13:35:50 PDT 2007 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add a boring file A ./.darcs-boring ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel