Re: Packages within a package

2007-10-23 Thread Henning Thielemann
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, John D. Ramsdell wrote: > When I first carefully read the Cabal documentation, I remember > wondering why there is a limit of one on the number of libraries in a > package. Reflecting on autoconf, and its AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS macro, I > also wondered why packages cannot be comp

patch applied (cabal): Regenerate GHC/Makefile.hs from GHC/Makefile.in

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
Tue Oct 23 11:38:04 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Regenerate GHC/Makefile.hs from GHC/Makefile.in M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.hs -1 +1 ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/lis

patch applied (cabal): Only use ld -x on systems where ld supports that.

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
Tue Oct 23 11:37:38 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Only use ld -x on systems where ld supports that. Hopefully this fixes it for both ordinary builds and via ghc makefiles. M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC.hs -5 +25 M ./Distribution/Simple/GHC/Makefile.in -1 +1 _

Re: Patch for Haddock 2.0 support

2007-10-23 Thread David Waern
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 01:25 +0200, David Waern wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here's the (new) patch that adds support for Haddock 2.0. > > I've applied it in Cabal HEAD. How do I test it? Install Haddock 2.0 from http://darcs.haskell.org/SoC/haddock.ghc, then run "cabal haddock" for some package. David

patch applied (cabal): pass cpp-options to cpphs

2007-10-23 Thread Ross Paterson
Tue Oct 23 11:42:10 PDT 2007 Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * pass cpp-options to cpphs M ./Distribution/Simple/PreProcess.hs -1 +1 ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

patch applied (cabal): Refuse to run any commands if the .cabal has been modified

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
Tue Oct 23 02:31:11 PDT 2007 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Refuse to run any commands if the .cabal has been modified See GHC bug #1372 This is a consistency check, intended to prevent this class of build failures: * Package P is updated, its version number is bumped, the

patch applied (cabal): Add support for Haddock 2.0

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
Sun Oct 21 16:14:15 PDT 2007 David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Add support for Haddock 2.0 M ./Distribution/Simple/Haddock.hs -7 +44 ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel

patch applied (cabal): Be explicit about the base version dependency

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
Tue Oct 23 05:24:17 PDT 2007 Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Be explicit about the base version dependency don't just leave it up to the default search order M ./Cabal.cabal -2 +3 ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://

Re: Patch for Haddock 2.0 support

2007-10-23 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 01:25 +0200, David Waern wrote: > Hi, > > here's the (new) patch that adds support for Haddock 2.0. I've applied it in Cabal HEAD. How do I test it? Duncan ___ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://www.haskell.o

[Hackage] #166: sdist puts Happy-generated .hs files in the wrong place

2007-10-23 Thread Hackage
#166: sdist puts Happy-generated .hs files in the wrong place -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone: Component: Cabal |