People are often unsure about where they can help out with Cabal. One
thing we can do to make that easier is to point out smaller simpler
tasks that people might like to have a go at.
We have a list of tasks that are marked as easy or very easy:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/report/13
#24: Cabal shouldn't try to build GHCI libs on platforms without GHCI
+---
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: ijones
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: norma
#67: sdist doesn't include .hi-boot files
+---
Reporter: ijones |Owner: ijones
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal |Milestone:
Component: Cabal libra
#103: feature request: preprocess files with ghc before haddock?
---+
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: ijones
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: normal|Mileston
#191: Hackage should check for common QA problems in ghc-options
+---
Reporter: duncan |Owner:
Type: enhancement| Status: new
Priority: normal |Mi
#201: clean doesn't report an error when it fails
+---
Reporter: guest |Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal |Milestone
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 19:16 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Duncan Coutts wrote:
>
> >> I thus have to add -lstdc++ as an ld-option.
>
> > It should be used when linking an executable since we call ghc to do
> > that. So I'm a bit confused about what's going on there. Any more
> > details?
>
>
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 20:09 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> I'm using ghc 6.8.2, and can't upload the LLVM bindings from
> http://darcs.serpentine.com/llvm/
>
> Here's the error I get from "cabal-upload -v":
>
> line 41: Parse of field 'extensions' failed:
>
> Unfortunately, it includes no f
