On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Leon Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Erik Hesselink wrote:
>>
>> I think that the eventual situation should have per-package uploaders.
>> It just seems to dangerous for anyone to be able to upload any
>> package, especially heavily-used ones.
>
> I
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Leon Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Duncan Coutts
> wrote:
>>
>> In the new server the security is a little better, but we still want
>> to have a manual step to grant uploader rights.
>
>
> Well, my impression is that the new server has a number of
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
> In the new server the security is a little better, but we still want
> to have a manual step to grant uploader rights.
>
Well, my impression is that the new server has a number of incomplete
features that we are ignoring for now, and that
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > Hackage2 will currently complain about anything that doesn't start with
> > one of:
> > Algebra, Codec, Control, Data, Database, Debug, Distribution,
> > DotNet,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:34:16PM +0200, Lars Viklund wrote:
>
> This chain of mails looks quite strange to me.
>
> Do you have some kind of ulterior motive for these inquiries?
What you might be missing is that Ross handles account requests for the
current Hackage server, and Leon is one of th
Yup, Duncan is exactly correct. We currently use a social process to
manage hackage. I'm part of the team that is taking over this social
process from Ross Paterson, so I'm trying to understand how it worked in
the past. That's my ulterior motive. :-D
As I've written in another mail to this
On 5 September 2012 14:34, Lars Viklund wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:19:53AM -0400, Leon Smith wrote:
>> Well, I guess that sort of counts as a refusal. What kinds of requests
>> lead you to ask for more information, and what kinds of information have
>> you asked for?
>>
>> On Wed, Sep
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:19:53AM -0400, Leon Smith wrote:
> Well, I guess that sort of counts as a refusal. What kinds of requests
> lead you to ask for more information, and what kinds of information have
> you asked for?
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ross Paterson wrote:
>
> > On We
Well, I guess that sort of counts as a refusal. What kinds of requests
lead you to ask for more information, and what kinds of information have
you asked for?
Best,
Leon
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:15:09PM +0100, Leon Smith wrote:
> > I h
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:15:09PM +0100, Leon Smith wrote:
> I have a question for Ross Paterson, namely do you decline an account
> request, and if so, what reasons do you have for declining an account
> request?
I haven't refused any requests, but occasionally I ask for more information
and don
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Ross Paterson wrote:
> That test is copied from Hackage1. We don't have any means of allocating
> the module namespace apart from squatter's rights and negotiation,
> but arbitrary expansion of the top level of the hierarchy is unhelpful,
> and having a warning fo
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Ross Paterson wrote:
>
> That test is copied from Hackage1. We don't have any means of allocating
> the module namespace apart from squatter's rights and negotiation,
> but arbitrary expansion of the top level of the hierarchy is unhelpful,
> and having a warning f
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Hackage2 will currently complain about anything that doesn't start with
> one of:
> Algebra, Codec, Control, Data, Database, Debug, Distribution,
> DotNet, Foreign, Graphics, Language, Network, Numeric, Prelude,
> Sound, Syst
13 matches
Mail list logo
