Hi Ian,
sorry for the late reply. If I'm not explicitly on TO/CC it is likely
that I miss that mail.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:57:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:12:41PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > with Firefox, I sometimes get an "XML Parsing error" on the
On 6 September 2012 21:06, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On 6 September 2012 19:49, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> * Only a single process can use the database at once. For example, if
>> the admins want a tool that will make it easier for them to approve
>> user requests, then that tool needs to be integrate
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> * Only a single process can use the database at once. For example, if
> the admins want a tool that will make it easier for them to approve
> user requests, then that tool needs to be integrated into the Hackage
> server (or talk to it o
On 6 September 2012 19:49, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've had a bit of experience with Hackage 2 and acid-state now, and I'm
> not convinced that it's the best fit for us:
>
> * It's slow. It takes about 5 minutes for me to stop and then start the
> server. It's actually surprising just
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:32:38PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> >
> > From the point of view of an existing user, they will go to the new
> > site, go to a special page, enter their username and their old
> > password and a new passwor
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:32:38PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
>
> >From the point of view of an existing user, they will go to the new
> site, go to a special page, enter their username and their old
> password and a new password (which can be the same if they like). This
> is a one off. After th
Hi Ian,
We used acid-state (actually happstack-state) at Silk for our session
store. We had the same problems you describe: slow shutdown/startup,
high memory usage, unable to inspect the data. We recently switched to
an SQL database. Just another data point.
Erik
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:49 PM,
On 6 September 2012 19:53, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 07:14:53PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:49:36PM +0100, Matthew Gruen wrote:
>> > To my knowledge, It's technically possible to import the old accounts.
>>
>> Why is that? I think that's worth explo
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> But if that's not the case then I can look into importing them.
>
I think that making the effort to import that data would be well
worthwhile. Thanks for looking into it.
___
cabal-devel mailing list
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Someone pointed out that one disadvantage of traditional databases is
> that they discourage you from writing as if everything was Haskell
> datastructures in memory. For example, if you have things of type
> data Foo = Foo {
> str :
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Leon Smith wrote:
> The thing is, since we have an account approval process and that we have
> a full, public log of everything that everybody's uploaded, people are
> going to notice when somebody uploads something they shouldn't.
No, it has already happened
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 07:14:53PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:49:36PM +0100, Matthew Gruen wrote:
> > To my knowledge, It's technically possible to import the old accounts.
>
> Why is that? I think that's worth exploring, as you'd be losing
> associations between 115
Hi all,
I've had a bit of experience with Hackage 2 and acid-state now, and I'm
not convinced that it's the best fit for us:
* It's slow. It takes about 5 minutes for me to stop and then start the
server. It's actually surprising just how slow it is, so it might be
possible/easy to get this
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 06:49:36PM +0100, Matthew Gruen wrote:
> To my knowledge, It's technically possible to import the old accounts.
Why is that? I think that's worth exploring, as you'd be losing
associations between 1150 users and 24456 uploads of 4442 packages.
(Not entirely, because the ol
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Matthew Gruen wrote:
> I'm a little bit confused on the exact set up. The uploaders group seems to
> be roughly the same thing as the trustees group. (Except uploaders has an
> AND relationship with per-package groups as far as membership requirements
> for upload,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On 5 September 2012 20:22, Erik Hesselink wrote:
>
> >> Also, we haven't had a single problem that I'm aware of on Ross
> Paterson's
> >> watch as bouncer for Hackage 1.The point I'm trying to make is that
> a
> >> technical solution i
On 5 September 2012 20:22, Erik Hesselink wrote:
>> Also, we haven't had a single problem that I'm aware of on Ross Paterson's
>> watch as bouncer for Hackage 1.The point I'm trying to make is that a
>> technical solution imposes additional administrative and technical overhead
>> whereas so
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:18:58PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:34:16PM +0200, Lars Viklund wrote:
> >
> > This chain of mails looks quite strange to me.
> >
> > Do you have some kind of ulterior motive for these inquiries?
>
> What you might be missing is that Ross hand
The User accounts page, echoing the Hackage 1 version, says "Passwords
are stored encrypted, so if you forget yours we can't recover it, but
will need to assign a new one. Just ask."
But the account registration page doesn't even ask for an email address,
so it would be difficult for administrator
19 matches
Mail list logo
