patch applied (hackage-server): "De-orphan some more instances"

2012-09-07 Thread devnull
Fri Sep 7 17:56:18 BST 2012 Ian Lynagh * De-orphan some more instances Ignore-this: 228a7ee88760855406af87ae37e340c3 M ./Distribution/Server/Framework/BlobStorage.hs -1 +6 M ./Distribution/Server/Packages/State.hs -13 +1 M ./Distribution/Server/Packages/Types.hs -1 +8

patch applied (hackage-server): "De-orphan the SafeCopy PackageIndex instance"

2012-09-07 Thread devnull
Fri Sep 7 17:42:46 BST 2012 Ian Lynagh * De-orphan the SafeCopy PackageIndex instance Ignore-this: 7307cd707f2862aa6ae5e9c2e4e4264c M ./Distribution/Server/Packages/PackageIndex.hs +9 M ./Distribution/Server/Packages/State.hs -8 ___ caba

patch applied (hackage-server): "Bump base64-bytestring dependency" and 10 others

2012-09-07 Thread devnull
Thu Aug 23 13:15:31 BST 2012 Ian Lynagh * Bump base64-bytestring dependency Ignore-this: 27b56b44488ca6d13ec612c62ab8aa7f M ./hackage-server.cabal -1 +1 Thu Aug 23 13:30:04 BST 2012 Ian Lynagh * Remove redundant warning suppression flags Ignore-this: d45d30c13b2751e8583c43704ffd15

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: > >> > >> I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not > >> important)? Or will that interfe

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Ross Paterson
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:54:08PM +0100, Erik Hesselink wrote: > Hmm, apparently I can't add labels. It's issue 1028. I don't think > it's important to fix before migrating, but it would be nice if > someone with privileges could label it. The issue there is mishandling unknown repository types,

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Erik Hesselink
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: >> >> I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not >> important)? Or will that interfere with this list? > > Definitely mark it hackage2. Mark it important if y

Re: Streamlining Account Requests

2012-09-07 Thread Leon Smith
Well, personally I don't want to receive an email on each request, I'd rather just check the review queue once or twice a day. But it looks pretty reasonable. Best, Leon On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Hi Leon, > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:12:55PM -0400, Leon Smith w

Re: Hackage 2 and acid-state vs traditional databases

2012-09-07 Thread Leon Smith
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > I think it would be best to use lowest-common-denominator SQL, so that > one can set up a Hackage 2 instance with postgreq, mysql, sqlite, or > another DB backend. > > While I think that's a laudable goal in theory, unfortunately the only data

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Erik, On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Erik Hesselink wrote: > > I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not > important)? Or will that interfere with this list? Definitely mark it hackage2. Mark it important if you think that it needs to be fixed before we mi

Re: Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Erik Hesselink
Hi Ian, I created a ticket for hackage2. Should I mark it as such (but not important)? Or will that interfere with this list? Erik On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Hi all, > > FYI, I've been making tickets labelled 'hackage2' and 'important' for > issues that we need to loo

Re: Streamlining Account Requests

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Leon, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:12:55PM -0400, Leon Smith wrote: > > However, I do think we need to streamline the account request process. I > have a pretty good idea of what I would like to have for LtU, which might > also be a good starting point for hackage. Basically: How does

Hackage 2 blocking tickets

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi all, FYI, I've been making tickets labelled 'hackage2' and 'important' for issues that we need to look at before migrating to Hackage2. The list is here: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues?labels=hackage2%2Cimportant&page=1&state=open Currently we have: * https://github.com/haskell/caba

Re: Hackage2 server ready for testing

2012-09-07 Thread Matthew Gruen
If I may take a stab, I think this issue is related to the use of strict XHTML. When you refresh, your browser renders what you have so far; if this is non-matching XHTML (that is, invalid XML), it will render an error. I think rendering strict and serving as transitional would fix this. In the lo

Re: Hackage2 server ready for testing

2012-09-07 Thread Simon Hengel
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:39:18PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:00:47PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:57:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:12:41PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: > > > > > > > > Firefox shows an

Re: Hackage 2 and acid-state vs traditional databases

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:36:07PM -0400, Leon Smith wrote: > > That said, I think there would be some potential advantages of moving to > SQL. My personal preference would for PostgreSQL, particularly because > of the wealth of datatypes it provides, or can be added to it via already > exis

Re: Hackage2 server ready for testing

2012-09-07 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:00:47PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 03:57:50PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:12:41PM +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: > > > > > > Firefox shows an error message (black and red text on yellow > > > background) while