Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-08-26 Thread Sascha Böhme
> Could autodoc use haddock.ghc? If it does, more haddock docs will work. I haven't tried yet. I could do so tomorrow. > Also, why do some packages not have a build log? For instance, > http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/phooey-1.2 . There has been a problem in an olde

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-08-25 Thread Conal Elliott
Could autodoc use haddock.ghc? If it does, more haddock docs will work. Also, why do some packages not have a build log? For instance, http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/phooey-1.2 . - Conal On 7/22/07, Sascha Böhme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > HackageDB

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-28 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
igloo: > > Hi Sascha, > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:55:22AM +0200, Sascha Böhme wrote: > > > > HackageDB [1] now contains automatically generated build logs for some > > packages, most of them also have automatically generated Haddock > > documentation. This is, for now, the result of my Google

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-27 Thread Ian Lynagh
Hi Sascha, On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:55:22AM +0200, Sascha Böhme wrote: > > HackageDB [1] now contains automatically generated build logs for some > packages, most of them also have automatically generated Haddock > documentation. This is, for now, the result of my Google Summer of Code > proje

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-26 Thread Ross Paterson
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:03:15PM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > I'd like to be able to: > > * recategorise packages online, There is a plan to have a plain-text file of attribute-value pairs outside of the package, with both a web interface and server-side program to set attributes.

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-22 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:55:22AM +0200, Sascha Böhme wrote: > Should build logs of erroneous packages be mailed to the package > maintainer? Definitely. What does it mean if there are no build logs at all, not even failed? Why do the docs for functorm 404, when then build log shows success

Re: Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-22 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
> Concerning the last question, there is already a list of ideas at [4], > but maybe more ideas or requests are now arising. Great work Sascha! I'd like to be able to: * recategorise packages online, e.g. we have "Compilers/interpreters" "Code generation"

Automatic generation of documentation for HackageDB

2007-07-22 Thread Sascha Böhme
Hello, HackageDB [1] now contains automatically generated build logs for some packages, most of them also have automatically generated Haddock documentation. This is, for now, the result of my Google Summer of Code project. The progress of the project can be followed from [2], the sources and som