Ian Lynagh wrote:
So in answer to your actual question, personally I think cabal-rpm
should be in its own package.
Fair enough.
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 01:42 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:32:36PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > Since my last attempt to add RPM support didn't go anywhere, I'd like to
> > figure out what's a good way to make progress.
> >
> > If I were to contribute a standalone pro
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:32:36PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Since my last attempt to add RPM support didn't go anywhere, I'd like to
> figure out what's a good way to make progress.
>
> If I were to contribute a standalone program called cabal-rpm (just as
> cabal-install is a standalone
Since my last attempt to add RPM support didn't go anywhere, I'd like to
figure out what's a good way to make progress.
If I were to contribute a standalone program called cabal-rpm (just as
cabal-install is a standalone program), would that be acceptable to add
to the darcs repo?
ht
