On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:54:51AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 01:06 +, Ross Paterson wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:07AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > > The issue was that hugs's version of ReadP needed -98 and Cabal's
> > > 'compat' version didn't, so I jus
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 01:06 +, Ross Paterson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:07AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 23:22 +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> > > Another advantage of Parsec is that then you'd be able to install a
> > > Hugs package without passing the -98 f
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:07AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 23:22 +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> > Another advantage of Parsec is that then you'd be able to install a
> > Hugs package without passing the -98 flag every time. ReadP requires
> > forall, but Parsec doesn't un
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 23:22 +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I'd like to work on this too. But I I'm lacking some knowledge here.
> >
> > At the moment cabal is using ReadP, right?
> >
> > Am I also right that ReadP is lacking user friendly error messages
> >
Hi
I'd like to work on this too. But I I'm lacking some knowledge here.
At the moment cabal is using ReadP, right?
Am I also right that ReadP is lacking user friendly error messages
compared to parsec?
I like the idea of using either { ; ; } or indentat
Dear Cabal-devel-list reader
I've written two mails to Isaac Jones concerning cabal.
He kindly asked me to use this list. So here I am.
Scroll to the end of this mail to get to the most important text (look for 3) )
1)
first mail with response
M
