>> Is there a known workaround to this problem, short of dropping the
>> "self" dependency in the cabal file? Would it be too much to ask if
>> hackage can upgrade it's cabal? Would that break further things?
>
> Using a development version of cabal-install would run the risk of
> breaking other p
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 05:34:33AM +, Levent Erkok wrote:
> I'm suffering from the issue reported in here:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/656. In brief, cabal
> had a bug that prevented it from running haddock successfully if a
> package contained both a library and an executa
Hello all,
This is actually a question about hackage, but looks like there's no
separate hackage mailing list.
I'm suffering from the issue reported in here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/656. In brief, cabal
had a bug that prevented it from running haddock successfully if a
pack
