[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 has an issue affecting it's community integr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27308] - Cactus should undeploy after tests are completed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Discussion+proposal] Removal of @author tags and making contributions visible

Am 13.03.2004 um 17:50 schrieb Vincent Massol: As you may know we have removed the @author tags in source files. This is to follow the ASF board recommendation. However that removes the indication of who "contributed" to what piece of code. Fortunately we have several other mechanisms to make contr

[Discussion+proposal] Removal of @author tags and making contributions visible

Hi, As you may know we have removed the @author tags in source files. This is to follow the ASF board recommendation. However that removes the indication of who "contributed" to what piece of code. Fortunately we have several other mechanisms to make contributions visible to all: 1/ CVS commit l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27225] - Additional class level method for ServletTestCase

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27308] - Cactus should undeploy after tests are completed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27308] - Cactus should undeploy after tests are completed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Race condition, what do we do? (was DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24842] - java.lang.NullPointerException in first test -- thread synchronization prob?)

> -Original Message- > From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 03:41 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: Race condition, what do we do? (was DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24842] > - java.lang.NullPointerException in first test -- thread synchronization > prob?)

RE: CVS email diffs (was RE: [VOTE] Move from bugzilla to JIRA)

> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 March 2004 15:49 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: CVS email diffs (was RE: [VOTE] Move from bugzilla to JIRA) > > Am 13.03.2004 um 15:31 schrieb Vincent Massol: > > Actually I think there is alr

Re: CVS email diffs (was RE: [VOTE] Move from bugzilla to JIRA)

Am 13.03.2004 um 15:31 schrieb Vincent Massol: Actually I think there is already a cactus-cvs mailing list but it is redirected to cactus-dev by default (that's what I understood). IIUC, there's a mail alias for every CVS module, for Cactus it is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. That is however not a mailing

RE: [VOTE] Do we also remove authors in xdocs?

Done + added ASL 2.0 licenses to xdocs files -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 March 2004 11:07 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Do we also remove authors in xdocs? > > Am 11.03.2004 um 11:03 schrieb Vincent Mass

CVS email diffs (was RE: [VOTE] Move from bugzilla to JIRA)

Actually I think there is already a cactus-cvs mailing list but it is redirected to cactus-dev by default (that's what I understood). That said, there are not a lot of commits and I don't think we've reached the point of saturation. I strongly believe that any Cactus developer should follow the CV

cvs commit: jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs faq.xml

vmassol 2004/03/13 03:24:32 Modified:documentation/docs/xdocs faq.xml Log: Added FAQ entry: "Does Cactus support HTTPS?" Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +16 -0 jakarta-cactus/documentation/docs/xdocs/faq.xml Index: faq.xml ===