RE: Serializing test case classes

2003-11-02 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 November 2003 17:14 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Re: Serializing test case classes > > (Sorry I'm late in jumping onto this thread) > > This seems like a g

Re: Serializing test case classes

2003-11-02 Thread Nicholas Lesiecki
(Sorry I'm late in jumping onto this thread) This seems like a good idea because it will finally eliminate the counterintuitive behavior of the test state not persisting from the client to the server. However, will the test be reserialized and sent back to the client to be finished? It seems like

Re: Serializing test case classes

2003-10-19 Thread Christopher Lenz
Vincent Massol wrote: I'd like to propose a change of implementation for Cactus 1.6. I'd like to serialize test case classes on the client side and pass them to the server side, instead of recreating the test case class on the server side. Benefits? This will allow several new use cases, such as pa

Serializing test case classes

2003-10-17 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi, I'd like to propose a change of implementation for Cactus 1.6. I'd like to serialize test case classes on the client side and pass them to the server side, instead of recreating the test case class on the server side. Benefits? This will allow several new use cases, such as parametrized tests