Re: [Cake] Beating bufferbloat

2016-04-24 Thread Arie
If you want a very recent cake version, you could use my build from here: http://ariekanarie.nl/openwrt/mvebu/ It's based on the very feature heavy OpenWRT build by trondah ( https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=50914 ), but using more recent cerowrt and cake stuff. You'll want to flash the

[Cake] Beating bufferbloat

2016-04-24 Thread Alec Robertson
Hi all, I’ve been out of the bufferbloat game for a while and want to try and beat it once again. I’ve got an FTTC connection (UK) which I get around 60Mbps on but with horrible bufferbloat on my Billion 8800NL. What router should I get that can run OpenWRT and handle this connection? Do the newe

Re: [Cake] [Cerowrt-devel] OK, what's the current recommendation(s)?

2016-04-24 Thread Joel Wirāmu Pauling
I am using a TP-Link ac1750 off a Shaw CMT 150/10mbit without issues using fq_codel and minimal tweaking. I had a wndr3800 before that and concur it's too underpowered. I drive AC wifi to the internet at the wan rate so can't complain. I know tp-link have recently come under fire, but if you can

[Cake] perhaps a performance optimization

2016-04-24 Thread Dave Taht
thought: since it takes two data packets for tcp to release an ack, perhaps it is better in some circumstances (notably with offloads enabled) to peel at quantum * 2, still delivering packets with a quantum (with a max of a mtu), so that delivering two unpeeled packets would cost that flow a DRR ro

Re: [Cake] perhaps a performance optimization

2016-04-24 Thread Jonathan Morton
> On 24 Apr, 2016, at 18:44, Dave Taht wrote: > > thought: since it takes two data packets for tcp to release an ack, > perhaps it is better in some circumstances (notably with offloads > enabled) to peel at quantum * 2, > still delivering packets with a quantum (with a max of a mtu), so that >