I think what's happening is that regardless of what I apply on the
OpenWRT router, the modem is queueing & possibly re-ordering packets
its way.
The huawei B6A modem has a linux firmware. If I could access the cli
to reduce the tx length, I think that this may help.
Also, the 3g connection defini
>>
>> It's interesting to see the saw tooth pattern for the upload. This was
>> not the case when the target was 5ms, which I believe was calculated
>> based on a 100ms worse rtt.
>
>
> I just noticed you use the dslreports pre-canned profiles for measuring. I
> would recommend against doing that.
Hi Loganaden,
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 19:13 , Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:40 PM, moeller0 wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2016, at 13:28 , Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 24 Jul, 2016, at 13:53, moeller0 wrote:
In theory interval can b
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 6:40 PM, moeller0 wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> On Jul 24, 2016, at 13:28 , Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 24 Jul, 2016, at 13:53, moeller0 wrote:
>>>
>>> In theory interval can be different for ingress and egress (think
>>> old-school SAT-internet with modem upload) i
> On 24 Jul, 2016, at 17:40, moeller0 wrote:
>
>>> In theory interval can be different for ingress and egress (think
>>> old-school SAT-internet with modem upload) it probably is easiest to only
>>> configure one interval setting for the time being.
>>
>> Since the interval parameter depends
Hi Jonathan,
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 13:28 , Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
>
>> On 24 Jul, 2016, at 13:53, moeller0 wrote:
>>
>> In theory interval can be different for ingress and egress (think old-school
>> SAT-internet with modem upload) it probably is easiest to only configure one
>> interval
> On 24 Jul, 2016, at 13:53, moeller0 wrote:
>
> In theory interval can be different for ingress and egress (think old-school
> SAT-internet with modem upload) it probably is easiest to only configure one
> interval setting for the time being.
Since the interval parameter depends on the RTT,
Hi Loganaden,
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 07:53 , Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> I've set the interval to 350ms, by using advanced option:
>
> Result is better:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520697
>
>
> I will submit a patch for sqm-luci so that the interval is
> configurable easily
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, moeller0 wrote:
> Hi Loganaden,
>
> this is exactly the right idea; interval basically defines the “reaction
> time” window, or the time the endpoints of a connection minimally require to
> actually react to the drop/mark signal. So on a slow link with RTTs in t
Hi Loganaden,
this is exactly the right idea; interval basically defines the “reaction time”
window, or the time the endpoints of a connection minimally require to actually
react to the drop/mark signal. So on a slow link with RTTs in the order of
300ms set interval to 300ms.
Target should be s
I am getting A to A+ for quality when setting the interval to 350ms.
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520977
I am getting - to C for quality when setting the interval to the
default value of 100ms.
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520957
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
