On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> sch_cake targets the home router use case and is intended to squeeze the
>>> most bandwidth and latency out of even the slow
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> sch_cake targets the home router use case and is intended to squeeze the
> most bandwidth and latency out of even the slowest ISP links and routers,
> while presenting an API simple enough that even an ISP can configure it.
>
> Examp
Cong Wang writes:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>>> wrote:
sch_cake targets the home router use case and is intended to squeeze the
most bandwidth a
On 04/30/2018 02:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I actually have a tc - bpf based ack filter, during the development of
> cake's ack-thinner, that I should submit one of these days. It
> proved to be of limited use.
>
> Probably the biggest mistake we made is by calling this cake feature a
> filter.
> On 1 May, 2018, at 7:06 pm, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> You have not provided any numbers to show how useful it is to maintain this
> code (probably still broken btw, considering it is changing some skb
> attributes).
A simple calculation shows what the maximum tolerable asymmetry for a
conventi
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On 04/30/2018 02:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I actually have a tc - bpf based ack filter, during the development of
>> cake's ack-thinner, that I should submit one of these days. It
>> proved to be of limited use.
>>
>> Probably the biggest mistake we made is by calling t
On 05/01/2018 11:53 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> *sigh* - can do, I guess. Though I'm not sure what that is going to
> accomplish, exactly?
I guess that nobody really wants to really review Cake if
it is a file with 2700 lines of code and hundreds of variables/tunables.
Sure, we have b
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 12:12:45 -0700
> It seems you guys spent years/months on work on this stuff, so what
> is the big deal about presenting your work in the best possible way
> ?
+1
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Eric Dumazet writes:
>
>> On 04/30/2018 02:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>>> I actually have a tc - bpf based ack filter, during the development of
>>> cake's ack-thinner, that I should submit one of these days. It
>>> proved to be of
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On 05/01/2018 11:53 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> *sigh* - can do, I guess. Though I'm not sure what that is going to
>> accomplish, exactly?
>
>
> I guess that nobody really wants to really review Cake if
> it is a file with 2700 lines of code and hundreds of vari
On 05/01/2018 12:31 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Could you comment on specifically what you believe is broken in this,
> please, so I can fix it in the same iteration?
>
Apart from the various pskb_may_pull() this helper should not change skb layout.
Ideally, the skb should be const an
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On 05/01/2018 12:31 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> Could you comment on specifically what you believe is broken in this,
>> please, so I can fix it in the same iteration?
>>
>
> Apart from the various pskb_may_pull() this helper should not change skb
> layout.
>
>
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> I guess that nobody really wants to really review Cake if
> it is a file with 2700 lines of code and hundreds of variables/tunables.
>
> Sure, we have big files in networking land, as a result of thousands of
> changes.
>
> If you split it,
13 matches
Mail list logo
