Re: [Cake] act_conndscp

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 00:37, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > > > > On 23 Mar 2019, at 18:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > >> wrote: > >> > >> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at >

Re: [Cake] [Ecn-sane] The two SCE tests I have in mind

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:03 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:32:03 +0100 > Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Jonathan Morton wrote: > > >> On 24 Mar, 2019, at 12:05 pm, Pete Heist wrote: > > >> > > >> tcpdump -r file.pcap udp port 2112 and greater 80 and "ip[1]

Re: [Cake] [Ecn-sane] The two SCE tests I have in mind

On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:32:03 +0100 Michael Richardson wrote: > Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> On 24 Mar, 2019, at 12:05 pm, Pete Heist wrote: > >> > >> tcpdump -r file.pcap udp port 2112 and greater 80 and "ip[1] != 0x1” > >> > >> “greater 80” ignores the handshake packets

Re: [Cake] act_conndscp

> On 23 Mar 2019, at 18:35, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: > > > >> On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant >> wrote: >> >> It looks like act_conndscp has been shot down by the kernel people, at least >> in its current form. Setting a conntrack mark from tc is regarded as