On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:13:24 +0200 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ah, crossed streams (just sent v2[0]).
Sorry about that, traveling knocked out my sense of time and I kept
thinking it's Thursday, and the discussion happened yesterday :S
> Hmm, okay, so as noted in the changelog to v2, just
patchwork-bot+netdev...@kernel.org writes:
> Hello:
>
> This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
> by Jakub Kicinski :
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:21:03 +0200 you wrote:
>> When the GSO splitting feature of sch_cake is enabled, GSO superpackets
>> will be broken up and the resulting
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:25 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> When the GSO splitting feature of sch_cake is enabled, GSO superpackets
>> will be broken up and the resulting segments enqueued in place of the
>> original skb. In this case, CAKE calls consume_skb() on
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:25 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> When the GSO splitting feature of sch_cake is enabled, GSO superpackets
> will be broken up and the resulting segments enqueued in place of the
> original skb. In this case, CAKE calls consume_skb() on the original skb,
> but still
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 2:39 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake
wrote:
>
> I figured y'all would find this an uplifting story - I certainly did!
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/nftables-and-qos-in-2021/112013/530
I cried. thx.
> -Toke
> ___
> Cake
hmm. what did this break above it? just stats? or a mem leak? or?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:25 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake
wrote:
>
> When the GSO splitting feature of sch_cake is enabled, GSO superpackets
> will be broken up and the resulting segments enqueued in place of the
> original
When the GSO splitting feature of sch_cake is enabled, GSO superpackets
will be broken up and the resulting segments enqueued in place of the
original skb. In this case, CAKE calls consume_skb() on the original skb,
but still returns NET_XMIT_SUCCESS. This can confuse parent qdiscs into
assuming
