Re: [Cake] Nanog l4s video

2024-02-23 Thread dave seddon via Cake
Off topic, but awesome and I think you'll enjoy it https://youtu.be/c2jiqkpw4VY?si=ju-H9ivyNAFBM_R0 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 20:57 dave seddon wrote: > https://youtu.be/E7okBZ8NfQ8?si=Ip4Lxo1g1Xx7oy4Z > ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net

[Cake] Nanog l4s video

2024-02-23 Thread dave seddon via Cake
https://youtu.be/E7okBZ8NfQ8?si=Ip4Lxo1g1Xx7oy4Z ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] cake's ack-filter vs GSO

2024-02-23 Thread Dave Taht via Cake
My memory about all this stuff is extremely scrambled by the mvneta driver which ws the first thing that drove me to consider GSO splitting in the first place. That evolved significantly. I also remember XMIT_more costing us more bandwidth than it gained, on the wndr3800, due to eating more cpu

Re: [Cake] cake's ack-filter vs GSO

2024-02-23 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake
Dave Taht writes: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:37 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> Dave Taht via Cake writes: >> >> > It has been years since I looked at cake's code. >> > >> > Does anyone remember why we do not ack-filter a gso-split? >> >> Because a GSO packet cannot be a pure ACK, so

Re: [Cake] cake's ack-filter vs GSO

2024-02-23 Thread Dave Taht via Cake
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:37 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > Dave Taht via Cake writes: > > > It has been years since I looked at cake's code. > > > > Does anyone remember why we do not ack-filter a gso-split? > > Because a GSO packet cannot be a pure ACK, so it wouldn't be filtered >