On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
wrote:
>
>
>> On 30 Jul 2018, at 00:42, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 3:05 AM Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> To whom it may concern (Dave) ;-)
>>>
>>> This is a general plea that when patches are submitted to
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:39 AM Pete Heist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2018, at 7:32 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>>
>> Exactly. Many members, including myself, are limited by our CPE links
>> during off hours, and by the backhaul during high
I use cake 24 hours/7 days. From Mauritius to Europe, it's around
250-300ms at worse. To use, it's up to 500ms.
qdisc cake 8035: dev pppoe-wan root refcnt 2 bandwidth 4Mbit diffserv3
triple-isolate rtt 300.0ms raw
Sent 170109544 bytes 1647933 pkt (dropped 186, overlimits 248108 requeues 0)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I started at the lanman2018 talk (to be given next tuesday), this past
> weekend, for "piece of cake" ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07617 )
>
> Try as I might, finding a memorable narrative hook to fit into 20
> minutes eludes me. There's so much
Hi folks,
My setup:
tp-link archer c7 v2 with Huawei E355-s2 in modem mode, not Hilink
mode. I've use the AT commands to make modem mode permanent.
ISP: MTML Mauritius.
modem mode uses 3 as txqueuelen.
Before using the hilink mode:
https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4808641
Hi Dave,
Hosting is prohibitively expensive in Mauritius. Would South Africa be
reasonable ? I can negotiate with one hosting provider there.
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
ce of cake as the QoS profile.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pretty impressive result.
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
> <logana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Got myself an
I configured it with an RTT of 300ms:
disc noqueue 0: dev lo root refcnt 2
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
qdisc cake 8007: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 3Mbit besteffort
flows rtt 300.0ms raw
Sent 10267782 bytes 23716 pkt (dropped 56,
Hi folks,
Got myself an archer c7 v2 with lede: (HEAD, r1185), on a 30Mbit/s
(download) and 4Mbit/s upload.
here is the result using dslreports:
https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4582998.
It looks to be working fine to me so far.
capacity estimate: 3Mbit
Tin 0
thresh
I went further, and rooted the android phone.
Then I set the txqueulen to 0 on ccimni0 and wlan0.
Here are the results:
https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4569339
https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4569379
Despite disabling the txqueuelen, The inbuilt TX/RX buffers are still
pretty high:
Hi Sebastian,
After reading about how much has been done in the latest kernel, I
decided to find a quick and easy way to get 3g mobile internet. I went
to another provider, and just put the SIM in an android one (Karbonn
Sparkle V) smartphone running Android 6.0.1.
Then, I activated the
I think what's happening is that regardless of what I apply on the
OpenWRT router, the modem is queueing & possibly re-ordering packets
its way.
The huawei B6A modem has a linux firmware. If I could access the cli
to reduce the tx length, I think that this may help.
Also, the 3g connection
>>
>> It's interesting to see the saw tooth pattern for the upload. This was
>> not the case when the target was 5ms, which I believe was calculated
>> based on a 100ms worse rtt.
>
>
> I just noticed you use the dslreports pre-canned profiles for measuring. I
> would recommend against doing
I am getting A to A+ for quality when setting the interval to 350ms.
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520977
I am getting - to C for quality when setting the interval to the
default value of 100ms.
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520957
___
that configuring the interval to be high for fq_codel
(350ms) does improve the latency under load.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
<logana...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've set the interval to 350ms, by using advanced option:
>
> Result is b
1454 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 4392 ecn_mark 0
new_flows_len 1 old_flows_len 1
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Loganaden Velvindron
<logana...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After going through:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-06
>
> I think that I shou
sufficient time to react.
The default interval value is 100 ms.
The default interval value is not suited for my 3g connection where
the worse-case RTT is much higher.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Loganaden Velvindron
<logana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems the i
> It seems the initial burst like behavior from the earlier test was a
> false positive; these test are still not beautiful, but at least they do not
> indicate that HTB+fq_codel as configured on your system do not suffer from
> uncontrolled bursty-ness. Unfortunately, I have no real
18 matches
Mail list logo
