Re: [Cake] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

2024-04-29 Thread Luis A. Cornejo via Cake
Al, I am not aware of the payload generation. -Luis On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL wrote: > Dave and Luis, > > Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat > compression? > > UDPST has a CLI option: > (m)-X Randomize datagram payload

Re: [Cake] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

2024-04-29 Thread MORTON JR., AL via Cake
Dave and Luis, Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat compression? UDPST has a CLI option: (m)-X Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes) When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was about 115kbps. Al > -Original

Re: [Cake] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

2024-04-29 Thread Jay Moran via Cake
Quick note from reading your blog entry. Last night, I played with the Cloudflare Speedtest a little. It downloads 25MB and a 50MB (or 100MB, can’t remember) as well on a “speedier” network after it does the 10MB file. I was getting 1.2Gbs down and 760Mbs up, 4ms of LUL, and seeing those larger

Re: [Cake] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

2023-01-12 Thread Dave Taht via Cake
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:30 PM Luis A. Cornejo wrote: > > Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases for > Starlink. Here is a primetime run: > > waveform: > https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d That is

Re: [Cake] [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

2023-01-12 Thread Dave Taht via Cake
Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this case. ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake