Re: CakePHP 3.0 autocomplete

2014-10-01 Thread heavyKevy
I got the Autocomplete widget to work with the following: Same autocomplete widget file as you but different code in controller and view file: Controller: public $helpers = [ 'Form' => [ 'widgets' => [ 'autocomplete' => ['App\View\Widget\Autocomplete']

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com
Actually mark_story most of the documentation is really really damn good. I am really not the most advanced coder and I can get around with the docs and API quite well. So maybe it has to do with laziness as well. But as you asked, what I never really understood is how cakes errors and exception

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread Jeremy Burns : Class Outfit
I've found the documentation pretty good on the whole, but there are two common issues: 1) It sometimes it lacks context. I can see the code example, but where does it go, what does it rely on and what does it impact? 2) It sometimes relies on an existing knowledge of the subject matter or some

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread mark_story
As someone who writes a pile of documentation, what kinds of advanced things have you found lacking? I've found it challenging to add more advanced examples as they often end up being very situational and we'll always have some use case that doesn't have a full example. I'm interested in what y

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread John Sposato
I think it's interesting that some people say the docs are terrible and others list documentation as a reason why it's cool or productive. If you're build a blog application that will only do simple relationships and not a lot of complex things, the documentation is great. However, we typicall

report dispaly

2014-10-01 Thread Nizeyimana Eugene
Am using cakephp to display my report and i want to display without repetiton (for instance survey may have many questions and answers and its numbers of respondents) for each surveys, using cakephp. And if it help me about graphs such histogram.. Thx -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebo

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com
So for me in 3 words, CakePHP3 is: - Best ORM - Awesome Book / Docs - Super Maintainance TLDR; CakePHP 2 Tops: - Book - Community - Linkable - Recursive = 3 ;P - Cake Bake and great bake looks out of the box - CRUDv3, Scaffold - Super maintainance cycles and fast security patches <3 - Super Stabl

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread Stefano Zoffoli
1. it relieves me to do the hard (and tedious) work with nice apis and abstraction layers that allow me to do my job better and quickly 2. it leads me to use good standards with conventions over configurations that allow me to have a cleaner code that is easier to mantain 3. it ha

Re: i18n problem

2014-10-01 Thread Lucky1968
UPDATE: I also have to use $array[0]['Model__i18n_translated_field'] in normal (not forms) view files. On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:32:05 AM UTC+2, Lucky1968 wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using i18n in my application and it seems that in certain views I can > use $array['translated_field'] as in oth

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread stork
> why you think CakePHP is a cool or productive framework to work with? Cool: 1. community 2. lightweight, with very few dependencies 3. easy way to contribute to the sources and docs Productive: 1. core code moving ahead (enhancements and adoptions of the new PHP features) wisely, very few depr

Re: The (bad) perception and image of CakePHP in the public

2014-10-01 Thread Dakota
1. Good, predictable and easy to understand documentation 2. Incredibly friendly and welcoming community and development team 3. Easy of use On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 10:28:32 UTC+2, José Lorenzo wrote: > > Before giving my own view into this problem, you you guys list the reaso

i18n problem

2014-10-01 Thread Lucky1968
Hi, I'm using i18n in my application and it seems that in certain views I can use $array['translated_field'] as in other views I need to use $array[0]['Model__i18n_translated_field'] to get the same information coming from the same find in the same model. Can anyone tell me why this is? This

Re: CakePHP 3.0.0-beta2 released

2014-10-01 Thread José Lorenzo
It is https://github.com/cakephp/migrations Sorry I got it wrong when writing the release On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:01:35 AM UTC+2, Dr. Tarique Sani wrote: > > What is the link to the Migrations plugin? > > T > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Reuben wrote: > >> Super excited for separat

Re: i18n base language and database fields

2014-10-01 Thread Dr. Tarique Sani
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Lucky1968 wrote: > > > I suggest you use your solution c), so make everything in English by __() > and do the translation when your application is ready by extracting the > .pot files. Extremely easy. > Yep! +1 to the above suggestion ./Console/cake i18n extract