It may be ridiculous comparing such different frameworks/languages, but it
does prove a good point on which ones would perform better given whatever
scope your application needs to fulfill.
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:25:41 PM UTC-7, phpirate wrote:
With all due respect but this benchmark
improvement)
- The raw PHP version uses a single database connection and a single
prepared query in its loop, while the CakePHP benchmark doesn't even have
persistent database connections enabled.
On Thursday, 28 March 2013 18:58:34 UTC, Miles J wrote:
Found this article. Pretty interesting
Found this article. Pretty interesting that Cake is last place in every
benchmark (given that it's multiple languages).
http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/03/28/framework-benchmarks/
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
With all due respect but this benchmark is ridicules!, comparing native
coded application with a framework app doesn't make any sense, worst yet
comparing programming languages in terms of performance taking in mind the
natural diffs between programming languages, its almost like comparing
water
You're completely right.
Le jeudi 28 mars 2013 20:25:41 UTC+1, phpirate a écrit :
With all due respect but this benchmark is ridicules!, comparing native
coded application with a framework app doesn't make any sense, worst yet
comparing programming languages in terms of performance taking
I still think with debug is 0 , cakephp will be run faster when debug is 2.
But when i use ApacheBench : ab -n 100 http://example.com in localhost . It
showed results is same.
I ever read this article: 8 ways to speed up
Cakephphttp://www.pseudocoder.com/blog/8-ways-to-speed-up-cakephp-apps
you cannot compare debug mode 2 and 0
thats nonsense and like comparing cars to screws
Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012 12:47:46 UTC+2 schrieb Điển vũ:
I still think with debug is 0 , cakephp will be run faster when debug is
2.
But when i use ApacheBench : ab -n 100 http://example.com in
as it does with it set to 0 ?
If this is the case, then I am sorry but the way you are performing your
tests is probably very flawed since debug=2 will output far more per
response than debug=0 does and should therefore be slower in benchmark
tests.
You should have a look at what it is you
I used ab apache's benchmark , command line: ab -k -n 100 http://b/ .
please read this :
https://gist.github.com/51757a95763fd8ac7b53
It seems debug 0 is litle faster compare with debug 2. But i remember in
previous version debug 0 is a lot faster .
--
Our newest site for the community
be slower (due to more debug stuff) - and no one actually
cares how much slower since only the productive one matters
you see that there is no point in doing that?
Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012 16:22:01 UTC+2 schrieb Điển vũ:
I used ab apache's benchmark , command line: ab -k -n 100 http://b
since only the productive one matters
you see that there is no point in doing that?
Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012 16:22:01 UTC+2 schrieb Điển vũ:
I used ab apache's benchmark , command line: ab -k -n 100 http://b/ .
please read this :
https://gist.github.com/51757a95763fd8ac7b53
It seems
I am a new comer and fresh patissier for CakePHP. My Question: CakePHP
use the concept of benchmarking to assess the performance of cake
defined actions or methods of framework classes in response time?
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check
There is a plugin called the DebugKit. It monitors benchmarks, SQL,
variables, session, etc.
https://github.com/cakephp/debug_kit
On Feb 22, 11:36 pm, Chris DB cdbardemori...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a new comer and fresh patissier for CakePHP. My Question: CakePHP
use the concept of benchmarking
Ekerete of AVNet Labs has performed PHP framework comparison
benchmarks http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks.
Cake performance - request per second aren't pretty. CakePHP
1.2.0.7125 rc1 was used! debug set to 0 - file caching is used.
Anyway, read for yourself
Two things to note:
1. He didn't use caching in any of the tests. This seems pretty silly,
since almost *every* production website should be doing that.
Essentially, if you're not planning on doing what you should be doing,
you should be interested in these numbers.
2. His admitted CI
Also, he probably has no idea how to set up a Cake install. He (and
you) would do well to refer to the benchmarks produced by Paul M.
Jones.
On Jul 1, 11:12 am, DragonI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ekerete of AVNet Labs has performed PHP framework comparison
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, John David Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two things to note:
and one more question:
the pages_controller is overridden for the test. Could this be a problem ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
And another thing - these things differ from php version to php version...
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Grant Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, these artificial benchmarks are useless. The modify loop
benchmark showing foreach being 80x slower than while surprised me, so
I gave
it would be good to test it in real life app.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that this link would be relevant to all Cake developers.
http://www.phpbench.com/
The most interesting part is the use of while loops instead of
foreach. Should
I agree, these artificial benchmarks are useless. The modify loop
benchmark showing foreach being 80x slower than while surprised me, so
I gave it a quick test here. I found quite the opposite, with
foreach($data as $key = $val) $data[$key] .= 'a';
being 5x faster than the while loop
Jérémy wrote:
You can find the sheet at http://www.jchatard.info/cakephp.xls
Can you publish it in a web format (html, text, PDF, even CSV...) please?
Thanks,
--
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ttllp.co.uk +44-870-4321-9-10
Web, localisation, koha, databases, GNU/Linux and statistics.
MJ Ray wrote:
Can you publish it in a web format (html, text, PDF, even CSV...) please?
Ok, here it is :
http://www.jchatard.info/cakephp.html
Jérémy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP
First off, CakePHP _HAS_ code generation (see the bake script).
I believe that skills needed should be OO and general knowledge about
PHP.
Ajax / Javascript FX requires an external library to be downloaded and
extracted to the js folder on the web root dir. You already have
built-in functions
Well, I don't want to do *all* your work for you, but this may be of
help:
http://cake.insertdesignhere.com/files/cakephp.xls
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group,
Thank you guys for your precisions, I've modified the document, thanks
to you.
I'll will let you know when the benchmark is published!
Jérémy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group
25 matches
Mail list logo
