On 11/13/06, Mariano Iglesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I actually feel the opposite :) IMHO CakePHP is better suited for bigger
> projects, but it always comes down as to what developers like really. Just
> two days ago I did a stress testing of an application I built with Cake on
> two smal
I will. Don't have the report with me as I left it on the office. But
will do when I regenerate it after adding more modules to the app.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cake PHP" group.
To post to
> I actually feel the opposite :) IMHO CakePHP is better suited for bigger
> projects, but it always comes down as to what developers like really. Just
> two days ago I did a stress testing of an application I built with Cake on
> two small servers: a LAMP on a Pentium 3 GHz, 2 GB RAM and on a Win
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de Bert Van den Brande
Enviado el: Lunes, 13 de Noviembre de 2006 03:51 a.m.
Para: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Asunto: Re: Cake PHP Vs Prado Vs Symfony
I've been using both Cake and Symfony at the same time, and I think
they are both great frameworks with some u
I've been using both Cake and Symfony at the same time, and I think
they are both great frameworks with some up- and downsides attached,
which may not even be downsides or upsides depending on your point of
view.
Typically, it's all a matter of requirements and preferences ... while
I believe it'
Bake is actually turning into a very robust command line system for
doing everything from code generation to deployment. Daniel Hofstetter
has created a Bake Tasks system which allows you to create and
distribute your own command line tasks, and much of Bake's original
functionailty is being modu
I can't really comment on other php frameworks. But I've been developing
software professionally for over 18 years, my "day" job is an Enterprise
Architect and I do a lot of J2EE apps, I've done EJB's, spring, struts,
hibernate, and then on the .NET side Nhibernate amongst another trillion
frame
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am new to Cake and just touched it a few days ago. My team did the
> site BetaMarker with Prado and Propel. For fatest code generation, we
> used symforny code generator.
More code generation is what I most want for cake. A way to turn, say,
a nicely implemented "find
Hi guys,
I am new to Cake and just touched it a few days ago. My team did the
site BetaMarker with Prado and Propel. For fatest code generation, we
used symforny code generator. Though after the site successfully
launch, the company decides to built a framework ourself.
I dont like Prado as it mak
P
Asunto: Re: Cake PHP Vs Prado Vs Symfony
On Nov 10, 9:31 pm, "Mariano Iglesias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> just look as how simple it is to build a SOAP interface on top of cake
Hm. I've been sweating over how to build an XMLRPC service in cake with
no success. I'v
On 11/10/06, Synchro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 9:31 pm, "Mariano Iglesias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > just look as how simple it is to build a SOAP interface on top of cake
>
> Hm. I've been sweating over how to build an XMLRPC service in cake with
> no success. I've not foun
I have a suggestion for the Community
Can someone write a 21 days to-go for buliding a website like Symfony
does?
I think, lack of doc is a shortage of the whole framework.
We should do more work to do it. To let more people know Cake, Use
Cake, and Love Cake!
--~--~-~--~~---
On Nov 10, 9:31 pm, "Mariano Iglesias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> just look as how simple it is to build a SOAP interface on top of cake
Hm. I've been sweating over how to build an XMLRPC service in cake with
no success. I've not found any real documentation on the web services
stuff at all. Th
: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-php@googlegroups.com] En nombre de Hank Marquardt
Enviado el: Viernes, 10 de
Noviembre de 2006 05:28 p.m.
Para: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Asunto: Re: Cake PHP Vs Prado Vs
Symfony
On 11/10/06, Mariano Iglesias
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How
Right ... which is why I wasn't following that Symfony was better for ajaxy apps.On 11/10/06, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Well, regardless of what you're doing, Symfony requires you to write
more code than Cake, so that automatically makes it less suited, withor without Ajax. Also, Cake has a
Well, regardless of what you're doing, Symfony requires you to write
more code than Cake, so that automatically makes it less suited, with
or without Ajax. Also, Cake has a lot of built-in features that allow
you to serve both Ajax and non-Ajax requests from the same controller
and view code.
Al
On 11/10/06, Mariano Iglesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However I chose Cake over Symfony because there's something about it (Ibelieve it's how the code is structured) that makes me feel cake is moreready for prime time corporate applications while symfony is more for
building small primarily ajax
Hi Andy, great question. I touched on a comparison of Cake to other
PHP frameworks briefly in a presentation I gave at NYPHP. You can see
a discussion and a link to the slides here
http://cake.insertdesignhere.com/posts/view/12.
If I had to give you two selling points on which to choose Cake, t
Cake PHP
Asunto: Re: Cake PHP Vs Prado Vs Symfony
propel is a nice, advanced ORM layer. not only that, i also think
orm-layers /data abstraction layers should not be a fundamental part of
a framework (unless it's very decent and there is enough dev-hours
available)
i've seen the i
2006 04:18 p.m.
Para: Cake PHP
Asunto: Re: Cake PHP Vs Prado Vs Symfony
propel is a nice, advanced ORM layer. not only that, i also think
orm-layers /data abstraction layers should not be a fundamental part of
a framework (unless it's very decent and there is enough dev-hours
available)
i&
propel is a nice, advanced ORM layer. not only that, i also think
orm-layers /data abstraction layers should not be a fundamental part of
a framework (unless it's very decent and there is enough dev-hours
available)
i've seen the issue of cake's not too-avanced data-abstraction layer
(let's call
her, that tells you
something.
Just MHO :)
PS: If have not evaluated prado, so I can't comment on it.
-MI
-Mensaje original-
De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Viernes, 10 de Noviembre de 2006 02:40 p.m.
Para: Cake PHP
Asunto
I can't say much about Prado or Symphony. For me the choice was cake or
code igniter. If you use php5 exclusively, then code igniter is a
pretty tempting choice. I choose cake because of the integration of
cake and amfphp.
On Nov 10, 8:30 am, "Nycran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings all,
Greetings all, I'm a new comer to Cake PHP.
I'd like to figure out what the key benefits of Cake are over
alternative PHP RAD frameworks, say Prado and Cake PHP (other than the
obvious tastiness of cake).
In a nutshell, I'm an experienced PHP coder (6 years), I know Java,
Python, C# (ASP.NET) an
24 matches
Mail list logo
