On 2 nov, 12:47, "Prof. No Time" wrote:
> Thanks so so much AD7six,
>
> Your suggestion of Router::url() worked like magic but for the second
> suggestion on the query, I tried it and the debug dump gave me this:
>
> SELECT `AppSetting`.`id`, `AppSetting`.`name`, `AppSetting`.`value`,
> `AppSet
You probably did not understand SQL / IN.
FOO IN (1,2,3) means FOO can be 1 OR 2 OR 3 or to express it other
ways FOO is contained in the list afterwards.
While I am not sure which is faster and what the "internal"
differences are, the result (should be) is the same.
I am not sure if you can en
Thanks so so much AD7six,
Your suggestion of Router::url() worked like magic but for the second
suggestion on the query, I tried it and the debug dump gave me this:
SELECT `AppSetting`.`id`, `AppSetting`.`name`, `AppSetting`.`value`,
`AppSetting`.`created`, `AppSetting`.`modified` FROM `app_sett
On 2 nov, 04:08, "Prof. No Time" wrote:
> Please people, I seriously need answers to the following questions. I
> need them treated as numbered please.
> Regards,
>
> Questions:
> 1. When shall cake PHP be fully PHP 5 compatible and all the PHP 4 OOP
> be gone since PHP 5.3 is already throwing
1. AFAIK CakePHP 2.0 will remove everything related to PHP 4.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 01:08, Prof. No Time wrote:
>
> Please people, I seriously need answers to the following questions. I
> need them treated as numbered please.
> Regards,
>
> Questions:
> 1. When shall cake PHP be fully PHP 5 comp
Please people, I seriously need answers to the following questions. I
need them treated as numbered please.
Regards,
Questions:
1. When shall cake PHP be fully PHP 5 compatible and all the PHP 4 OOP
be gone since PHP 5.3 is already throwing strict faces against some
PHP 4 constructs and I really
