Despite the naming convention, isn't the HABTM association really just
modeling the shared foreign key table relationship? For example, you
have a 'users' table and an 'items' table, and they are tied together
with the items_users table. Not considering cake, you would use this
because several
You got it right.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
thanks guv'ner
On Feb 23, 10:48 pm, rtconner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You got it right.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
