mindcharger wrote:
> I think this is a fairly good opportunity to learn...
and to turn good designed off-the-shelf-code into so called spaghetti-
code ...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP"
I think this is a fairly good opportunity to learn...
;-)
On Feb 8, 3:50 pm, "Károly Kiripolszky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mostly because I don't know how to use the HtmlHelper in the
> controller... :P
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becaus
Mostly because I don't know how to use the HtmlHelper in the
controller... :P
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsub
On Feb 8, 1:53 pm, "Károly Kiripolszky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Writing a function in an existing file instead of creating another
> source file (and also a class) is more simple for me.
why pass the function, instead of passing the data after using the
function..?
AD7six
Please note:
The
Writing a function in an existing file instead of creating another
source file (and also a class) is more simple for me.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send
Why not use a view helper for this instead? This is exactly what they
are made for.
Regards,
Ryan Rose
http://www.digiwize.com
On Feb 8, 5:49 am, "Károly Kiripolszky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi ppl!
>
> I discovered that it is possible to pass functions defined in the
> controller to the v
Hi ppl!
I discovered that it is possible to pass functions defined in the
controller to the view. However I must prefix the $this->set()
statement with an @ symbol or else PHP claims that there's and
undefined constant in the view at the line you try to call it. For
example I define my title form
