Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-02-02 Thread lober
hi gwoo i want to give you a email,but i don't know your email,so i have a problem about 1.20 bug i write this in postcontroller ajax is well,but write this in appcontroller is wrong,about ajax. my website:www.zhuyinghao.com var $helpers = array('Html', 'Form', 'Javascript', 'Ajax'); On 1月17日,

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-24 Thread Matt Curry
There is a very easy way to exploit this. I wrote about it here: http://www.pseudocoder.com/archives/2009/01/22/cakephp-digest-6/ -Matt http://www.pseudocoder.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cak

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-24 Thread hellfish
Nice to know this. I'm going to update before I write a new post concerning what I believe is a bug in the auth component. Brb On Jan 21, 6:31 pm, Schreck wrote: > You could probably d/l fiddler2 (http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/) > and use that to do whatever injections are needed. This app a

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-21 Thread Schreck
You could probably d/l fiddler2 (http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/) and use that to do whatever injections are needed. This app also works with any browser that supports proxies and even works remotely. On Jan 19, 7:38 am, Pyrite wrote: > Is there a way to test this CVE without Firefox? I do not

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-19 Thread Gwoo
@mlix changeset 7979 fixed the issue. Security prevents CSRF and ensures that form inputs properly match the values being submitted. @Pyrite im so sorry. I don't really have a way around your IE7 problem, short of storming the castle and demanding your work installs FF. --~--~-~--~~--

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-19 Thread Pyrite
Is there a way to test this CVE without Firefox? I do not have the option of Firefox at work. Only IE7. On Jan 16, 4:14 pm, Gwoo wrote: > After the release of 1.2 Final, we received a lot of attention. Some > of this came in the form of a security concern. The issue could affect > sites relying

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-19 Thread milx
Is there a link to the details of the security concern? I know it's fixed now but I'm interested if I should always use the Security Component and what the implication is if I don't. Tried googling and looking in Trac but I can't seem to find out what the problem was. On Jan 16, 10:14 pm, Gwoo

Re: Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-18 Thread Martin Westin
Thanks for the heads-up. Updating now... On Jan 16, 11:14 pm, Gwoo wrote: > After the release of 1.2 Final, we received a lot of attention. Some > of this came in the form of a security concern. The issue could affect > sites relying on the AuthComponent for user authentication, without > the u

Security Notice for 1.2.0.7962, Using AuthComponent without SecurityComponent

2009-01-16 Thread Gwoo
After the release of 1.2 Final, we received a lot of attention. Some of this came in the form of a security concern. The issue could affect sites relying on the AuthComponent for user authentication, without the use of the SecurityComponent. Essentially, an attacker may be able to obtain credentia