Yeah, makes sense.
On Sep 16, 5:00 pm, villas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I think only the dev team can explain exactly why Cake is the way it
> is. However, I thought that you'd probably answered your own
> question :-)
>
> Many of us do not use MySql and we are delighted that so much e
On Sep 13, 11:47 pm, Brenton B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll chalk this up to storage-type dependency ... (ex: MySQL can do
> unsigned ints, but others can't) ...
Yeah, that.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
Hi,
I think only the dev team can explain exactly why Cake is the way it
is. However, I thought that you'd probably answered your own
question :-)
Many of us do not use MySql and we are delighted that so much effort
is being made to develop Cake in a DB-agnostic way. The idea is that
Cake devel
Really, no one knows? For serious?
On Sep 13, 9:47 pm, Brenton B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, in MySQL I can create a table with a field that has type integer
> with unsigned integer, which as we all know will define the length to
> 10 and doubles the maximum possible value.
> So why doesn't
