Friday works.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:54:13 -0600, Steven Gill wrote:
I'm in
On 12-01-16 4:53 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote:
yep
On 12-01-16 4:45 PM, "Simon MacDonald"
wrote:
Fine with me.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Shazron wrote:
Frid
hey guys, i've started a wiki page for some of the projects we'll be
resourcing adobe folk on soon (or already)
http://wiki.phonegap.com/w/page/49911226/2012%20Roadmap%20Projects
pls review and let me know what you think, if you want to help and
update if you are!
I'm in
On 12-01-16 4:53 PM, "Filip Maj" wrote:
>yep
>
>On 12-01-16 4:45 PM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>
>>Fine with me.
>>
>>Simon Mac Donald
>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Shazron wrote:
>>> Friday is fine for me
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:13 P
yep
On 12-01-16 4:45 PM, "Simon MacDonald" wrote:
>Fine with me.
>
>Simon Mac Donald
>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Shazron wrote:
>> Friday is fine for me
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael Brooks
>> wrote:
>>> Friday is fine for me, but I am
>What's the process that was used within PhoneGap?
I would say a mix... Something that was considered a "big" change was RTC,
but day-to-day / bug-fix type stuff was CTR (or even just "C" ;) )
Fine with me.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Shazron wrote:
> Friday is fine for me
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael Brooks
> wrote:
>> Friday is fine for me, but I am unavailable between 11:30am-12:00pm PST.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Mo
Friday is fine for me
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael Brooks
wrote:
> Friday is fine for me, but I am unavailable between 11:30am-12:00pm PST.
>
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>
>> Today steve and I started an automation suite for the creation of a
>>
Hey guys,
So from what I understand, for me to be accepted to the committer list, I need
to be voted in first. Is that correct Jukka? If that is the case, could someone
start PMC private discussion about this? Thank you!
On 2012-01-13, at 3:40 PM, Yohei Shimomae wrote:
> Thanks Jukka,
>
> Ye
Friday is fine for me, but I am unavailable between 11:30am-12:00pm PST.
Michael
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Today steve and I started an automation suite for the creation of a
> release from a tag. Hope to be done this by end of week. Lets setup a
> call to review th
Today steve and I started an automation suite for the creation of a
release from a tag. Hope to be done this by end of week. Lets setup a
call to review that, the Apache process for releasing and an update on
our progress towards 1.4
How is Friday morning for everyone?
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> Some assumptions here:
>
> - that we want a commit process that includes approval
Do we?
Within Apache the terms RTC and CTR (as in Review-Then-Commit [1] and
Commit-Then-Review [2]) are widely used to describe the kind of review
pro
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Jukka: Very curious about how we can help infra w/ the stuff Patrick
> is describing here. We have it in our queue to block out some
> resources to improve our testing automation. This is close enough that
> the work could be combined. Ju
Hey
I implemented what I discussed earlier and on Android 2.x it works as I
would expect a browser history to work and we manage to have PhoneGap work
for the most part across pages, with it throwing away and reloading the
plugins once the HTML has been loaded into the webview. However, on the
Ga
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 15:04, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Patrick: I'd like to help on this. We could cobble this together on
> our own servers to get things going. Appears we could use the Jira
> rest api: http://docs.atlassian.com/jira/REST/latest/
While I'd love to work on this kind of automation
Why don't we have the plugins get re-initialized on the onPageFinished code
in the WebViewClient (CordovaClient in this case)? We already fire
onNativeReady here, so we should probably do the re-init here as well. I
don't believe that onPageFinished is called when we load an anchor tag, but
I'll t
We have to maintain our own history on Android because there are issues
with native and JS interactions.
1. When loading a new page the native code must be reinit
- so we get deviceready
- get new plugins otherwise plugins would call callbacks meant for
previous page
2. When returnin
Jukka: Very curious about how we can help infra w/ the stuff Patrick
is describing here. We have it in our queue to block out some
resources to improve our testing automation. This is close enough that
the work could be combined. Just don't know the implications to Apache
infrastructure.
Patrick:
Nice work Yohei.
I like how the Cordova site is focused heavily on contributors "Getting
Started with the Apache Way."
I can see the "Contribution" becoming large and we will want to make it as
simple (step-by-step) yet informative as possible. The contribution section
may instructions for:
- Si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shazron Abdullah closed CB-166.
---
> Integrate Cleaver (PhoneGap as a component) into the core
> ---
Maybe wasn't supported very well, perhaps only on older versions? File
that up as an issue/task in JIRA so we can follow up and turf unnecessary
code if possible!
On 12-01-16 10:36 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote:
>Why are we implementing our own history again instead of using the WebKit
>history? This
Why are we implementing our own history again instead of using the WebKit
history? This code seems especially fragile, and I would rather get rid of
it than keep trying to fix it/write tests for it if possible.
Joe
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Simon MacDonald
wrote:
> Hey Joe,
>
> I pulled
On 16 January 2012 18:18, Filip Maj wrote:
>
>>Fil,
>>
>>Would you explain why fair governance and project neutrality depends upon
>>Apache infrastructure?
>
> Fair governance and neutrality don't rely on any specific infrastructure
> (be it Apache or GitHub), rather, the entity that owns the code
>Fil,
>
>Would you explain why fair governance and project neutrality depends upon
>Apache infrastructure?
Fair governance and neutrality don't rely on any specific infrastructure
(be it Apache or GitHub), rather, the entity that owns the code in the
first place, and the processes that are follow
Thanks for the clarification, Jukka.
I have an additional question concerning one set of files:
PhoneGapLib/classes/Notification.*
These files have a copyright notice but no license. Since the author did
sign the Apache/MIT license that Nitobi tracked, I think I can add the
Apache/MIT license use
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:32, Patrick Mueller wrote:
> I'm wondering if someone would like to experiment with me on getting an
> approval process in place for commits.
>
BTW, I'd be interested in finding out about other Apache project's commit
processes.
Probably the most interesting commit pr
add vendor files to weinre instead of pulling in at build time
--
Key: CB-176
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-176
Project: Apache Callback
Issue Type: Task
C
I'm doing some work on weinre this week, trying to get it a point of doing
an "official" Apache build.
I just committed the license change switcheroo, directly from a local
branch to the apache master.
I'm wondering if someone would like to experiment with me on getting an
approval process in pla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13187007#comment-13187007
]
Eric Murphy commented on CB-174:
Thanks for the links. I starred them. I am surprised this bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13187006#comment-13187006
]
Simon MacDonald commented on CB-145:
Oh, you mean this comment line:
// Version 1.2.0
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13187000#comment-13187000
]
Olivier Louvignes commented on CB-145:
--
VERSION is indeed up to date, seems it is just a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186998#comment-13186998
]
Simon MacDonald commented on CB-174:
You are running into this Android bug:
http://code.g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186996#comment-13186996
]
Simon MacDonald commented on CB-145:
Really? Check the VERSION file in the cordova-android
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186916#comment-13186916
]
Olivier Louvignes commented on CB-175:
--
I'm using Sencha Touch 2.0 pr3 :
http://www.sench
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186905#comment-13186905
]
Patrick Mueller commented on CB-175:
Thanks for the bug report.
This seems to be a proble
Weinre crashes on Android 2.3.3
---
Key: CB-175
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-175
Project: Apache Callback
Issue Type: Bug
Components: weinre
Reporter: Olivier Louvignes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186774#comment-13186774
]
Olivier Louvignes commented on CB-145:
--
Thanks!
About the version, i do have the "1.2.0"
36 matches
Mail list logo
