[Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Rich Sbardella via Callers
Folks, I was at a dance not too long ago, and as the caller (not me) invited dancers to join the last dance of the night, he also declared it to be in Becket formation. One visiting couple, who had been waiting eagerly for the last dance , put on their jackets and left disappointed, stating that

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Bill Olson via Callers
Wow, maybe that couple didn't actually know what Becket Formation was? bill List-Post: callers@lists.sharedweight.net Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:45:17 -0500 To: call...@sharedweight.net Subject: [Callers] Becket Formation From: callers@lists.sharedweight.net Folks, I was at a dance not too long

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Michael Fuerst via Callers
Or maybe they were confusing Becket with gypsy Michael Fuerst      802 N Broadway      Urbana IL 61801  217 239 5844 On Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:20 PM, Bill Olson via Callers wrote: #yiv5709207139 #yiv5709207139 --.yiv5709207139hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv570

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Mac Mckeever via Callers
The only thing I can imagine is that many Becket dances leave the minor set - making them slightly more complex.  Perhaps they had some bad experiences with a couple dances and haven't given them another chance. They seem to be different - even though they really aren't - maybe they are just mor

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Ron Blechner via Callers
Whoa. Weird story, Mac. Baffled On Dec 10, 2015 3:30 PM, "Mac Mckeever via Callers" < callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > The only thing I can imagine is that many Becket dances leave the minor > set - making them slightly more complex. Perhaps they had some bad > experiences with a couple d

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Ron Blechner via Callers
Sorry, I meant Rich. On Dec 10, 2015 3:54 PM, "Ron Blechner" wrote: > Whoa. Weird story, Mac. Baffled > On Dec 10, 2015 3:30 PM, "Mac Mckeever via Callers" < > callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > >> The only thing I can imagine is that many Becket dances leave the minor >> set - making them

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Ryan Smith via Callers
As Mac pointed out, becket dances can be more complex/confusing. Removing a need to separate you from your partner at the end of the dance, allows for some choreographic flexibility. All the same, most beckets are not notably more complex/confusing than most improper contras. My guesses are: 1 -

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Greg Allan via Callers
> > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:45:17 -0500 > From: Rich Sbardella via Callers > To: "Caller's discussion list" > Subject: [Callers] Becket Formation > Message-ID: > redta1ysblw_5buy...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread John W Gintell via Callers
My favorite progression requires Becket formation: circle left and then slide up/down and circle with the next pair. > On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:43 PM, Greg Allan via Callers > wrote: > > Hi, > > That is a somewhat familiar story from my point of view. I dance in a number > of different folk d

Re: [Callers] Contras with a Hey

2015-12-10 Thread Frederick Park via Callers
Here’s To Us - Duple Improper, Becket Formation (Clock-wise Progression) A-1 Ladies Pass R. then dance around Neighbor - passing L. with Him (into the other Lady’s place), Long Lines Dance Forward and Back A-2 Gents Pass R. then dance around Partner - passing L. with Her, Gent’s Pass R.

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Neal Schlein via Callers
Actually, I can see this. As others suggested, it is probably a matter of the couple's prior poor experiences with dances in Beckets. That said, there are two fairly common tendencies in Becket formation choreography which are somewhat aggravating and another which absolutely drives me up a wall.

Re: [Callers] Becket Formation

2015-12-10 Thread Alexandra Deis-Lauby via Callers
If confronted with that bias again, one could always point out that many improper dances if started in the b section instead, become Becket dances and vice versa. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Neal Schlein via Callers < callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > Actually, I can see this. > > As