“More advanced” is a pretty vague term and could be interpreted in various
ways. I didn’t think Colin’s response was “terribly” sarcastic. That, too,
may be interpreted variously. Find your own way and be peaceful with it.
More on topic, get the basics down first, then embellish.
On Sat, Apr 27,
t hotshots are having a great
time.
Jim Thaxter
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:48 PM Donna Hunt via Callers <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Would you ever (or have you ever) asked someone not to return based on
> their inability to dance?
> Is there some point at which you as
Not sure I understand the question. Are you asking if you should call each
dance in the medley 6 or 8 times (if so, how many dances do you include in the
medley?)? Or if you should have 6 or 8 dances for a medley? Or perhaps an
entirely different question? Maybe you're asking about doing 8
Yesss Nicely put.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Chip Hedler wrote:
> The reason I didn't like the idea is because I'm against voting, which I
> think would prejudice readers toward a post based on its author as opposed
> to considering the content of the post. The
Could you explain what it means to "vote people up?"
It sounds like one would have to be "voted up" to be able to comment.
I'm not sure I would call any of the discussions I've read flooded.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Lindsay Morris wrote:
> Today its 29
Like the email list.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Lindsay Morris wrote:
> How many of us (you lurkers included) would be willing to see this forum
> move to a web-based forum?
>
> One advantage I see is User Ranks: over time, we vote up certain people
> because they
I would be interested to know the purpose of licensing a dance. Speaking
just for myself (although I assume a lot of other amateur choreographers do
the same thing), I write a few dances mostly for my own amusement, but
don't intend to ever publish them. I'm pretty sure there is a very limited