3-33-33 lovers and callers - I have been calling this great dance recently
and noticed that dancers of various experience levels in several venues have
had trouble with the transition in the B2 from the Ladies Do-si-do 1 1/2 to
the balance with the next neighbor that starts the dance. They have tr
I've had pretty good luck with it, possibly because I have the women ID
the next neighbor early on. They know which face to look for. After
that, they get a better feel for the area to aim for to find the new
neighbor. A couple of seriously disoriented dancers can really play
havoc with this
1. Have the guys help it out by looking on the left diagonal during the
long lines for a new neighbor.
2. Replace the do-si-do with women allemande _left_.
3. Use an alternate B2 of ladies chain, star left.
-Chris Page
San Diego
On Thursday, June 20, 2013, Rickey Holt wrote:
> 3-33-33 lovers
:
From: Kalia Kliban
Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
To: "Caller's discussion list"
List-Post: callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 2:10 PM
I've had pretty good luck with it, possibly because I have the women ID the
ne
New Cumberland, PA
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/20/13, Kalia Kliban wrote:
>
> From: Kalia Kliban
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
> To: "Caller's discussion list"
> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 2:10 PM
>
> I've had p
Hey all,
I've seen it called w/ a ladies chain ending the B-2, which worked very
nicely. Seemed to eliminate the confusion. I think it all depends on the
crowd and walk through.
Paul
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Rickey Holt wrote:
> They have trouble
> finding that next neighbor, even after several times through, and with
> translating the momentum of crossing the set to that of up and down the line
> of the first part of the dance.
You can remind them in the walk throu
er, with RH ready for the next neighbor. Some in the
> caller community have dubbed this version of the dance 3-33-34.
>
> Dave Colestock
> New Cumberland, PA
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/20/13, Kalia Kliban wrote:
>
> From: Kalia Kliban
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tam
I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a classic.
-Original Message-
>From: Michael Barraclough
>Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
>To: call...@sharedweight.net
>Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
>
>There are thousands of contras. If one
ic.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Michael Barraclough
>>Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
>>To: call...@sharedweight.net
>>Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
>>
>>There are thousands of contras. If one doesn't w
Kalb wrote:
> > I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a classic.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >>From: Michael Barraclough
> >>Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
> >>To: call...@sharedweight.net
> >>Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis
non-crooked version. If
something works, it works. But even some of the old classics have modern
contemporary versions. The folk process at work, again.
Dave Colestock
New Cumberland, PA
--- On Thu, 6/20/13, Bree Kalb wrote:
From: Bree Kalb
Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classi
12 matches
Mail list logo