Typical of the thief--distracts you with one hand while picking your pocket 
with the other. Only this thing is a multi-tentacled monster, and it's now 
going 
for the jugular..www.zengardner.com

IMF CALLS FOR 
ALTERNATIVE TO $$ AS WORLD'S RESERVE 
 



GOD BLESS AMERICA AND CAMBODIA !  










"The United States
financed the economic and military development of the Soviet Union.
Without this aid, financed by U.S.
taxpayers, there would be no significant Soviet military threat, for there
would be no Soviet economy to support the Soviet military machine, let alone
sophisticated military equipment." Should your listener scoff, you need
only to hand him a copy of this book. it will stuff his mouth with footnotes.
" THE BEST ENEMY MONEY CAN BUY "By Antony C.
Sutton




HENRY KISSINGER'S MISSION TO DISMANTLE THE AMERICAN EMPIRE IS ACCOMPLISHED ( 
1960-2011). NOW HE IS CALLING  FOR THIS :Update - All US Ambassadors 
Called Back To Washington  

2-9-11

 

 






We received the following thoughts on the widely-circulated 
story alleging ALL US Ambassadors were recalled to DC for a conference from a 
retired career member of the US Dept of State... 
State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom 












Chuck Baldwin
February 11, 2011
I was thrilled to see J.B. Williams report in NewsWithViews.com that the 
State of Montana has a broad-based State nullification bill currently proposed 
in its legislature. Derek Skees (R-Whitefish) is the State legislator who has 
introduced this much-needed legislation.
See the story at:
http://www.newswithviews.com:80/JBWilliams/williams130.htm
The 
fact is, Skees’ State Nullification bill is only one of several outstanding 
freedom-first bills that is currently before the Montana legislature. I urge 
readers to go to PolyMontana.com to look at the many other fine pieces of 
pro-freedom legislation pending in the Montana State legislature:
http://polymontana.com/legislators/freedom-bills/
Unfortunately, one of those very fine bills has already been defeated: the 
“Sheriffs First” bill sponsored by Senator Greg Hinkle (R-Thompson Falls). This 
bill is long overdue and absolutely necessary to prevent federal usurpation of 
State and local law enforcement. That the Montana legislature failed to pass 
this bill indicates just how necessary it is to elect State legislators who 
truly understand constitutional government. I urge readers to read the 
following 
defense of the Sheriffs First law, written by my son, Constitutional Attorney 
Tim Baldwin:
http://tinyurl.com/4aclefs
Look through the list of the other freedom bills presently before the Montana 
State legislature and one will instantly recognize the potential for this State 
to stand at the “tip of the spear” in the reclamation and restoration of State 
sovereignty, freedom, and independence. (Plus, it reinforces why my family and 
I 
made the life-changing decision to move to this beautiful and wonderful 
State.)
For example, there is 

1.a bill to nullify federal health care laws; 
2.a bill to 
eliminate the misapplication of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution; 
3.a 
bill to nullify the Endangered Species Act; 
4.a bill to authorize permit-less 
Concealed Carry; 
5.a bill to transfer management of certain federal lands; 
6.a bill 
to provide the State eminent domain authority for federal lands; and, of 
course, 
the Sheriffs First act, which would have required the Sheriff’s authorization 
for federal law enforcement agencies to conduct arrests, searches, and 
seizures.








I would dare say: if you are a freedom-minded individual, goose bumps ran up 
your spine just from reading the above summary. I got goose bumps simply 
writing 
about it. Can one imagine the kind of freedom that would be unleashed in this 
great State should even a handful of these bills actually become law? 

And think 
of the numbers of other State legislatures that would quickly follow suit 
(especially here in the West) should any State legislature pass and a State 
governor sign these kinds of freedom protections into law!

This is why I keep insisting that, if freedom has a chance to survive in 
these United States, the American people must get their eyes off of Washington, 
D.C., and start focusing on their individual states. 

The authority and power to 
properly defend liberty has always rested with the states. I’m not saying we 
should not be concerned about who our US representatives and senators are–or 
who 
is elected President. I am saying, however, that freedom will never be restored 
from inside the Beltway. 

It is State independence, resolve, and nullification 
that will ultimately preserve and protect our liberties. And, as the creators 
of 
the US Constitution acknowledged, State nullification is absolutely requisite 
to 
freedom’s survival.

And, fortunately, Montana is not the only State with freedom-loving men and 
women in its legislature. 
I am hearing of lawmakers in states such as Oklahoma 
and Virginia (and several others) who are introducing similar freedom bills in 
their respective State legislatures. 

The question is, as always, will the people 
of these states get behind their brave legislators and help them get these 
freedom bills passed? 

If they are preoccupied with watching the major television 
network news channels (that focus almost entirely on national and international 
politics), they will not even know that these freedom bills are being proposed 
(most local media ignore them, too), and, therefore, will be totally inactive 
and ineffective in helping to restore the freedoms they claim to love.


I repeat: if freedom is to have a new birth in America, we must stop focusing 
on Washington, D.C., and start focusing on our individual states! I cannot 
overstate it: liberty will be won or lost at the State level!




 



The US
sellout of the KHMER PEOPLE IN CAMBODIA in 1975, THROUGH HENRY KISSINGER. 

THE KHMER PEOPLE WANT YOU TO FIND: 

Dr. Helmut Sonnenfeldt'S  MASTER KEY TO RESTORE CAMBODIA INDEPENDENCE. 






Cambodia
needs Independence from Vietnam
and the Vietnamese invaders. 

Vietnam
must cease her occupation of Cambodia
at once.

 

BURY

======================================================================================




 
  

 
 
  



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gaffar Peang-Meth <peangm...@gmail.com>


Date: Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM
Subject: There are reasons for rebellion
To: 




PACIFIC DAILY NEWS
February 9, 2011

There are reasons for rebellion



By A. Gaffar Peang-Meth

It's the nature of politics, domestic and international, that in an 


interconnected world, what occurs in one area will sooner or later, directly or
indirectly, affect other areas.

Having knowledge of what's happening and an understanding of how and why it is 
happening helps one forecast a future trend and avoid the unpleasant  and the




negative that lies ahead.

But many disregard the compelling desire of men and women to seek freedom, 
forget that there can be no lasting peace without the establishment of 
broad-based human rights. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights 




contained the warning -- that without the rule of law to protect human  rights,
man has no alternative but to rebel against oppression.

Since the declaration, many rebellions have occurred, many autocracies have




fallen and some forms of democracy have emerged.

 
Quest for dignity


Columnist David Brooks wrote in the Jan. 31 New York Times about a "great
mental  tide" that has swept across the world: People who had accepted "certain 
fixed places in the social order," began to think they must no longer be 




ignored, and they march "for responsive government and democracy" --  themes
echoed by protesters in Cairo today.

Brooks presented some lessons learned: Those who tolerate autocrats for the 
sake of stability are ill informed; autocracies are more fragile than  any other




form of government; those who say speeches by outsiders have  no influence on
places like Egypt have it backward, as it's the climate  of opinion that is the
basis of the revolt; most countries that have  experienced uprisings end up




better off; though public hunger for  dignity is unabated, the road from
autocracy to democracy is rocky and  perilous; outside powers must help
democrats build governments that  work.

He wrote: "Over the past decades, there has been a tide in the affairs of men




and  women. People in many places have risked their lives for recognition and 
respect. Governments may lag, and complications will arise, but still they will
march. And, in the long run, we should be glad they do."





Revolution

It's hard to believe that an underprivileged 26-year-old Tunisian street 
vendor, who had pushed his wheelbarrow to sell produce since he was 10  in an
unknown, poor agrarian area, sent an autocratic ruler of 23 years  fleeing the




country, and unleashed a tsunami of revolutionary fervor  that keeps dictators
near and far guessing.

He was Mohamed Bouazizi of Tunisia's hardscrabble town of Sidi Bouzid, about
200 miles south of the capital of Tunis. Bouazizi quit high school  to work




full-time to help his mother, uncle and six siblings.

On Dec. 17, 2010, something happened: Faida Hamdy, 45, an inspector, 
questioned Bouazizi over a permit. She confiscated his fruit, which Bouazizi
wrestled to get back from Hamdy. She allegedly slapped him in  the face in




public, while two of her colleagues beat him and took away  his electronic
scale.

Embarrassed and angry, Bouazizi went to the municipal building to retrieve his
wares. There, he was beaten again.

He then walked into the governor's office and asked to see the governor to 




lodge his complaint. He reportedly said he would set himself afire if refused.
An audience was refused.

Bouazizi obtained some bottles of paint thinner, doused and lit himself on
fire on the street in front of the governor's gated office. His  self-immolation




triggered small local riots that spread like wildfire to Tunisia's cities,
including the capital.

Tunisians protested massively against the government for corruption, poor living
conditions, high unemployment, repression.





Ten days later, President Ben Ali, ruler since 1987, fled Tunis for Saudi 
Arabia.

The Tunisian revolt emboldened young people in other countries, such as in Egypt
today, to proclaim, "Yes, we can, too!"






Deeper problems
 
On the surface, Hamdy had done little more than humiliate a man, something 
that she may have done at other times. The subsequent "investigation"  found she



hadn't slapped the vendor. Her brother, Fawzy Hamdy, said he  was thrilled to be

among the first to join the protests in Sidi Bouzid,  but also said he didn't
believe his sister had slapped Bouazizi. "It's  the lie that toppled a 
dictator," he said.

Sidi Bouzid is a poor town, ignored for years by Tunis. Tunisia's official 




unemployment rate is 14 percent, but Sidi Bouzid's is higher than 30 percent,
with rampant corruption, nepotism and cronyism. Sidi Bouzid,  like neighboring
towns, is home to young, idle, jobless, underemployed  and poor Tunisians, who




roam the cafes, smoke and play the card game,  "rami." Some intoxicate
themselves with moonshine.

President Ben Ali rarely visited Sidi Bouzid. When he did, local officials
busily  paved roads, planted full-grown trees, painted the youth center and 




added skateboard ramps and ping pong tables reserved for "people with 
connections."

In the Jan. 30 Washington Post, Sudarsan Raghavan described Tunisia as the 
"personal treasure chest" of Ben Ali and wife, Leila Trabelsi, and their 




families. For example, Trabelsi was selling a Tunisian island and  shutting down
a highly regarded private school to promote her own. Ben  Ali's son-in-law owned
many luxury car dealerships and lucrative  businesses. The Ben Ali and Trabelsi




families controlled companies and  real estate holdings, "sometimes taken by
force."

As one reflects on that 1948 warning in the Universal Declaration of Human 
Rights, it seems entirely clear why Tunisia was ripe for revolt. It is 




remarkable only that it took so long.

A. Gaffar Peang-Meth, Ph.D., is retired from the University of Guam. Contact him
at peangm...@yahoo.com.





http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/201102090400/OPINION02/102090322









-


                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to camdisc@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
camdisc-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to