On 8/6/07, mat wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/6/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/6/07, mat wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot for your detailed answers. After reading the documents of
> > > Camel, the materials were not enough for me to grab the who
On 8/6/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/6/07, mat wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your detailed answers. After reading the documents of
> > Camel, the materials were not enough for me to grab the whole
> picture. I
> > have to read some of the source code
On 8/6/07, mat wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your detailed answers. After reading the documents of
> Camel, the materials were not enough for me to grab the whole picture. I
> have to read some of the source code.
>
> I found out in DefaultEndpoint class:
> public int has
Thanks a lot for your detailed answers. After reading the documents of
Camel, the materials were not enough for me to grab the whole picture. I
have to read some of the source code.
I found out in DefaultEndpoint class:
public int hashCode() {
return endpointUri.hashCode() * 37 + 1;
On 8/3/07, mat wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why A Producer extends Processor but A Consumer NOT?
Great question :)
So when you create a producer, you just want to pass message exchanges
into it - so you can treat a producer just like any kind of Processor
object and just call process().
Whe
