Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Martin Jambon
On 06/28/11 06:53, Paolo Donadeo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:41, Philippe Wang wrote: >> I believe that discussions about types that less than 1% of all ocaml >> programmers understand, recursive functors (for these it must be even >> worse), GC tweaking, etc. is "hacking". >> I don't thin

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread Wojciech Meyer
SerP writes: > Yes. it seems that the problem in android libc, but it is not clear > where exactly Did you try to disassemble/trace the program in the debugger of what possibly from libc is being inlined/called? Maybe it's some initialisation problem or most likely a wrong target. You compile fo

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread SerP
Yes. it seems that the problem in android libc, but it is not clear where exactly On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Pierre-Alexandre Voye < ontolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe an issue with android's libc which manage float in certain > circumstance ? > > Le 28 juin 2011 19:52, "SerP" a écrit :

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread Pierre-Alexandre Voye
Maybe an issue with android's libc which manage float in certain circumstance ? Le 28 juin 2011 19:52, "SerP" a écrit : ocaml 3.12.0 On iphone it's work's too. But on android - gcc-4.4 it's not working. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > > -[ Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:22:... -- Caml-l

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread SerP
ocaml 3.12.0 On iphone it's work's too. But on android - gcc-4.4 it's not working. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > -[ Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:22:01PM +0400, SerP ] > > let x = 255. in > > int_of_float x > > Works for me with ocaml 3.12.0 compiled with GCC 4.2.1 on ARM eabi > (not o

[Caml-list]

2011-06-28 Thread Agnius Vasiliauskas
-- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 compatibility report

2011-06-28 Thread Damien Doligez
On 2011-06-27, at 17:57, Markus Mottl wrote: > I have traced down this problem to the C-bindings of the bin-prot > library. When it is supposed to unmarshal bigarrays, it always > allocates them using Fortran-layout. But this should be C-layout for > "bigstrings". I will fix this in the next r

Re: [Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread rixed
-[ Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:22:01PM +0400, SerP ] > let x = 255. in > int_of_float x Works for me with ocaml 3.12.0 compiled with GCC 4.2.1 on ARM eabi (not on android, though). -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Be

[Caml-list] ocaml arm eabi

2011-06-28 Thread SerP
Has anyone experience for running ocaml native programms on android? My problem in floating point calculations. let x = 255. in int_of_float x Result is always 0. Any suggestions very welcome. -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Paolo Donadeo
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:41, Philippe Wang wrote: > I believe that discussions about types that less than 1% of all ocaml > programmers understand, recursive functors (for these it must be even > worse), GC tweaking, etc. is "hacking". > I don't think it's harmful to have such discussions in the

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Edgar Friendly
On 06/28/2011 09:38 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: A kind of "ocaml-dev" mailing list, I think. As far as I can tell, this kind of discussion takes place somewhere private. Maybe inside INRIA, maybe with Caml Consortium members only. I think it's a good idea to open things up, but this ki

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Philippe Wang
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > What I don't like with the current beginners list is that it is a yahoo > list. This means yet another painful "create an account" process to > subscribe, useless stuff added at the end of emails, and general an > unnecessary interface clut

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:35:58 +0200 > Gabriel Scherer wrote: > Philippe, what do you mean by "hack with a tiny community", A kind of "ocaml-dev" mailing list, I think. -- RMA. -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Begi

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Christophe Raffalli
Hello, May be one can have one mailing list with two addresses and a subject with [Caml-list] or [Caml-list-beginners] So people that really don't want to see one of the two kinds of traffic can filter ... Cheers, Christophe -- Christophe Raffalli Universite de Savoie Batiment Le Chablais, bure

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not

2011-06-28 Thread Matteo Frigo
Mehdi Dogguy writes: > Anyone knows who is administrating caml-beginners mailing-list? The list was started by a gentleman called Ernesto Torresin, whom I know personally and I have worked together with. I think he is still running it. The last email address I have for him is , which may or ma

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Wojciech Meyer
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 28/06/2011 14:17, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:46 +0200 > >> Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > > > >> Is it really necessary to > >> have two mailing-lists, especially when considering the traffic on > >> both

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 28/06/2011 14:17, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:46 +0200 >> Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > >> Is it really necessary to >> have two mailing-lists, especially when considering the traffic on >> both lists ? > > I am also subscribed to the "beginners" list. > IMHO, i

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Gabriel Scherer
What I don't like with the current beginners list is that it is a yahoo list. This means yet another painful "create an account" process to subscribe, useless stuff added at the end of emails, and general an unnecessary interface clutter added on top of an otherwise simple and efficient communicati

Re: [Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Philippe Wang
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:46 +0200 >> Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > >>  Is it really necessary to >> have two mailing-lists, especially when considering the traffic on >> both lists ? > > I am also subscribed to the "beginners" list

[Caml-list] beginners or not (Was: build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin)

2011-06-28 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:46 +0200 > Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > Is it really necessary to > have two mailing-lists, especially when considering the traffic on > both lists ? I am also subscribed to the "beginners" list. IMHO, it's useless to have 2 MLs. -- RMA. -- Caml-list mailing lis

Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 Release Candidate

2011-06-28 Thread Alexandre Pilkiewicz
Hi everyone 2011/6/15 Damien Doligez : > - Changed default minor heap size from 32k to 256k words. Did anyone find any performance improvement due to this change? And if so, how big? On some purely functional programs putting lots of pressure on the GC, it went up to a good 10% improvement, but I

Re: [Caml-list] build problem with 3.12.0; no ocamlrun in /usr/local/bin

2011-06-28 Thread Fabrice Le Fessant
On 06/28/2011 06:47 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:39:20 +0200 >> derek.sch...@colostate.edu wrote: >> Hi, I'm a new user of ocaml, > > Also note that there is a mailing list for "beginners": > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/ Looking at the other

Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 compatibility report

2011-06-28 Thread Florent Ouchet
Damien Doligez a écrit : When I was young, printf didn't exist, so I used echo $foo | tr -d '\012' But Gerd's advice is good, next time I'll use printf. Hello, Thanks for the help! I've fixed the makefile and it's now using "printf" instead of "echo -n". VSYML 1.8 should be released as