Hello.
It uses bind and return, but I'm very unsure
whether the code can be called monadic IO,
since lwt itself does not respect the monad laws.
What monadic laws lwt does not respect ?
Lwt sees values of type Lwt.t not as IO actions,
but sometimes as the values of these actions.
It
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:20:05 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones r...@annexia.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:40:11PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
And there is a reason why you cannot match (in Ocaml) on the content
of strings (or arrays). It won't be easy to implement efficiently
(you
Thank you Raphael !
Indeed, keeping the C encoding underneath strings (and arrays) is a nice
property.
ph.
2011/9/14 Raphael Proust raphla...@gmail.com
Richard Jones described the internals of OCaml quite concisely. The
difference between char arrays and strings is exposed in part two of
his
Le 17/09/2011 08:38, Dmitry Grebeniuk a écrit :
It does not respect the monad associativity:
(m = f) = g == m = (fun x - f x = g)
[...]
==
open Lwt;
value () = Printf.printf case 1, enter two lines:\n%!;
value m = Lwt_io.read_line Lwt_io.stdin;
value f_v =
Gabriel Scherer gabriel.sche...@gmail.com writes:
Indeed, a let-bound [] is generalized to a polymorphic ('a list), while a
let-bound (ref []), or (Array.make n []), is not generalized. It would be
unsound to do so as if you had a reference to a polymorphic ('a list) you
could
add elements
Hi all,
tl;drhttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tl%3Bdr
I created an installer for Windows. I'd be happy if you could try it
out, give me feedback, and tell me if it works for you. Download it
there: http://yquem.inria.fr/~protzenk/caml-installer.html.
What does
Hi,
One year since the last update of ocamljs. And now, ocaml is 3.12.1,
lwt is 2.3.
So does anyone know when we will see the next update of ocamljs ?
thanks !
Christophe
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
