Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Excerpts from Jeremy Yallop's message of Tue Jun 24 15:03:19 +0200 2008:
Is there a way to replace the default lexer in Camlp4? I'd like to use
(an extended version of) one of the OCaml grammars, but with a different
lexer.
You can rebuild (I mean functor
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Jeremy Yallop wrote:
Ok, I've built a slightly modified clone of PreCast. What's the best
way to persuade Camlp4 to use it? The original PreCast seems fairly
hardwired, e.g. in the Register module.
If you get an answer to this, please post it. I
On a related note: how hard would it be to convince camlp4 to translate
the Coq-like context notation
expr % M
to the open in construct
open M in expr ?
Since % is already an infix operator, this shouldn't be too hard.
Andrej
___
Caml-list
Excerpts from Hezekiah M. Carty's message of Tue Jun 24 17:43:52 +0200 2008:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Jeremy Yallop wrote:
On a related note I had a crazy brainwave that we could use camlp4 to
use
From: Khoo Yit Phang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I discovered that the attached snippet of Ocaml does not compile in
ocamlc, but does work in the ocaml toplevel (tested in v3.10.0 and
3.10.2). Removing anything (except the :int annotation) causes the
error to go away. Is it a bug in the
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response! I've encountered another strange one
that may be related. The code below compiles only if you remove the
underscore in the method _a. The error message is similar to the
earlier one, but I think it's a different problem?
class ['a] node d =
object
