I have used Eclipse with OcamlDE but I would like to use DDD as a
interface with GDB debugging Ocaml code. Is it even possible? If so,
can you share your experience? Thanks.
Rob Stites
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://y
I grabbed the latest uintlib from OCamlForge, but I'm unsure how to
install it so that I can use it in an OCaml program. I made the proper
files (by running "ocaml native.ml"), but I'm not sure where to place
them (and apparently you have to run the function install first? I'm not
sure how to load
It might be a bit off-topic, but if you want to ease the syntaxic pain only,
you can use the pa_openin ( http://alain.frisch.fr/soft.html#openin ) camlp4
extension :
open Graph in { g with nodes = foo }
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription manageme
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Edgar Friendly wrote:
Brighten Godfrey wrote:
Actually, what I want seems to be the way OCaml treats methods in
objects: given an object, you can name the method directly without
mentioning its module. I can write a function
let f x = x#some_method "argument"
Brighten Godfrey wrote:
> Actually, what I want seems to be the way OCaml treats methods in
> objects: given an object, you can name the method directly without
> mentioning its module. I can write a function
>
> let f x = x#some_method "argument"
>
> where `x' might be an object defined in
On Aug 10, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
On Sunday 10 August 2008 11:04:37 Brighten Godfrey wrote:
Hi,
Here's something that I've wondered about for years; maybe someone
here can enlighten me. One of the few major annoyances in OCaml code
style is that if I define a record in one modul
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Raj Bandyopadhyay wrote:
> I was wondering if someone has a good explanation for this. I assume it
> has to do with some overhead of malloc, but I'm not sure.
I doubt it's anything to do with malloc. The ocaml runtime does its own
memory management, whic
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> I have some code like the minimal example below. Notice the
> '{ () with ... }'
> record expression. If I remove the '() with' part, it fails to
> compile.
For reference, Bluestorm found an answer to my question, by building
the
Raj Bandyopadhyay said:
> Hi folks
>
> I was performing a little experiment to try and quantify some of the
> overhead of memory allocation in OCaml. Here is a the kind of little
> program that I am using for timings:
This experiment does not make much sense. Ocaml has its own memory
management f
Hi there,
it seems that `ocamlc' wants to create the .cmo file in the same
directories as the .ml file. More specifically I observe this:
$ ocamlc -g -c -I +gmp -I ../../../interfaces/OCaml
../../../interfaces/OCaml/ppl_ocaml_types.ml
I/O error: ../../../interfaces/OCaml/ppl_ocaml_types.cmo:
Hi folks
I was performing a little experiment to try and quantify some of the
overhead of memory allocation in OCaml. Here is a the kind of little
program that I am using for timings:
let rec alloc3 n l =
if n = 0 then l
else alloc3 (n-1) ((1,2,n)::l)
The alloc3 function allocates a tu
11 matches
Mail list logo
