-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 02:31:10 am Alain Frisch wrote:
> Peng Zang wrote:
> > For objects, we require that all objects
> > implement an equal method that satisfies the semantic contract.
>
> How do you ensure that the method is indeed implemen
Hi all !
I've encountered a strange bug while preparing a caml module with C function.
Depending on the execution of a caml-defined function, the toplevel is
evaluated or not, leading to a segfault when calling a caml callback from C.
The code of the C part is:
<---
#include
#include
thanks, the type problem is solved. but is there a way to write nested
functions? so the powerf isn't exposed outwards...
and how can I rewrite the if statements in a case or cond way? pattern
mathcing is only on types right? cond a la scheme would be nice.
let rec powerf(n, pow, acc) =
if po
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:08:33 +0200, circ ular wrote:
>
> thanks, the type problem is solved. but is there a way to write nested
> functions? so the powerf isn't exposed outwards...
>
> and how can I rewrite the if statements in a case or cond way? pattern
> mathcing is only on types right? cond a
Le 3 sept. 08 à 19:24, Christophe TROESTLER a écrit :
May I suggest
[...]
3. Have a look at the the programming guidelines [1]. In particular,
this point [2] may show you a cond is not needed to make your code
nice and readable.
Best,
Daniel
[1] http://caml.inria.fr/resources/doc/gui
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I've encountered a strange bug while preparing a caml module with C function.
> Depending on the execution of a caml-defined function, the toplevel is
> evaluated or not, leading to a segfault when calling a caml callback from C.
> [...]
I don't know whether this is a bug
