Re: [Caml-list] XML library for validating MathML

2008-09-19 Thread Matt Gushee
If you'll forgive the slight off-topic-ness ... I spent a couple of years as an XML consultant. Got out of the business partly for the kinds of reasons Gerd cites. Anyway, just a couple of quick comments: Gerd Stolpmann wrote: Thanks. Initially, I thought XML is an easy format - because it

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Keeping local types local?

2008-09-19 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 01:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm looking for another way out. As far as both your examples and my experiments seem to indicate, the only way of escaping scope is to return a continuation which calls one of the protected functions and ignores the result.

Re: [Caml-list] csml: high-level bindings between OCaml and .Net

2008-09-19 Thread Alain Frisch
Ludovic Coquelle wrote: Probably something went wrong somewhere ... I did use PInvoke intensively on mono and I never experienced problem (I do not remember which version of mono, it was around 2 years ago). I have absolutely no doubt that P/Invoke does work under Mono. I'm just saying that I

Re: [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores

2008-09-19 Thread Richard Jones
If you also follow the rest of that thread, there's a message passing OCaml version by Gerd Stolpmann which also scales properly. To be honest, matrix multiplication interests me not at all since no one is hand coding their own matrix multiplication when there are perfectly good, parallel

[Caml-list] Extending .annot files

2008-09-19 Thread Nathaniel Gray
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Xavier Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From what I've heard, there's also an OCaml summer of code project that enriched the info found in .annot files. So, it's certainly time to discuss extensions to .annot files, but let's do that globally, not one at a