[Caml-list] UNU-IIST positions vacant

2009-03-23 Thread Jeff Sanders
ad.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug repo

[Caml-list] ocamlnet on solaris 5.11

2009-03-23 Thread Joel Reymont
Has anyone managed to build ocamlnet on solaris 5.11? I think ocamlnet makes the assumption that solaris is sunos (bsd) whereas it's sysv after 4.x. Thanks, Joel --- http://linkedin.com/in/joelreymont ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscrip

[Caml-list] Re: ocamlnet on solaris 5.11

2009-03-23 Thread Joel Reymont
This is the error that I get trying to compile ocamlnet on solaris 5.11 gmake gmake: *** No rule to make target `netsys_posix.cmo', needed by `netsys.cma'. Stop. I can't figure out how netsys_posix.cmo gets produced. --- http://linkedin.com/in/joelreymont

Re: [Caml-list] Google summer of Code proposal

2009-03-23 Thread Xavier Leroy
I would like to develop LLVM frontend to Ocaml language. LLVM does participate in GSoC. LLVM do not mind to developed a ocaml frontend as LLVM GSoC project. I want to discuss details with you before I will make an official proposal to LLVM. [...] Do authors of ocaml has something to say about

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Google summer of Code proposal

2009-03-23 Thread Kuba Ober
On Mar 21, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote: Joel Reymont writes: On Mar 21, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: . You will succumb to ocamlopt's current run-time representation which is objectively inefficient (e.g. boxing floats, tuples, records) and was only chosen because the com

Re: [Caml-list] Google summer of Code proposal

2009-03-23 Thread Jon Harrop
On Monday 23 March 2009 14:19:00 Xavier Leroy wrote: > 3- A language implementation like OCaml breaks down in four big parts: > 1- Front-end compiler > 2- Back-end compiler and code emitter > 3- Run-time system > 4- OS interface > Of these four, the back-end is not t